The CSA Group (formerly the Canadian Standards Association), is a not-for-profit standards organization whose primary activities are producing technical standards that are intended to address the needs of a group of affected adopters. Among the fifty-seven different areas of specialization are climate change, business management and safety and performance standards, including those for electrical and electronic equipment, industrial equipment, boilers and pressure vessels, compressed gas handling appliances, environmental protection, and construction materials.
@9DCFY8F8mos8MO
Leave the funding alone.
Have a stable amount of funding.
@9CP97J410mos10MO
This is a good cause but we should focus on getting Canada out of debt and then pump money into organization
@9C7W87VRhinoceros11mos11MO
I don’t understand the question
@9BKQJDB1yr1Y
funding is good where it is
@9BK2RQ61yr1Y
Have a healthy amount of funding.
@9BJY9J41yr1Y
No, unless if they made it for a good cause
@962KL2Y1yr1Y
Yes, but first streamline its operations
@99SZPFK1yr1Y
Yes, but they should put stricter regulations and guidelines to protect the environment
@99SFZCX1yr1Y
Yes, as long as they put stricter regulations on fossil feuls, and prioritze renewables
@99MVFWX1yr1Y
Decrease Protections. Keep funding the Same
Yes. Criminalize companies that knowingly produce unsafe products.
@99KVBFJ1yr1Y
Idk about this situation
@99BZG771yr1Y
Yes, but publications should be freely available
@98PPJXC1yr1Y
Yes, it should be increased but in return, it should play its role well in society
@98HL8XH1yr1Y
Again, case by case scenario. Some probably need an increase, while other areas a decrease.
@97YCH8R1yr1Y
Depends on how the increase the funding
@97WDKK81yr1Y
@97V8LWC1yr1Y
i do not have an opinon on this qustion
@96JJRBT2yrs2Y
No, and abolish it as it is liberal propaganda.
@967SY7D2yrs2Y
@8W4BGQ5New Democratic3yrs3Y
Never heard of them, abolish and make relevant in individual industry
@8VRD2783yrs3Y
Depends on how much fund they need to sustain the technical standards.
@9FCZK2L7mos7MO
No, it has shown to be unfair and biased. I would support replacing it.
@9F3YN588mos8MO
Yes, this is peoples safety were talking about. Certainly CSA approved PPE would be better than risk of injury or loss of life.
@9F2VYKP8mos8MO
Leave the funding on how it is.
@9DG796F8mos8MO
@9BP44CP12mos12MO
Yes, but the money cannot go toward labour or bonuses.
@93TM7X62yrs2Y
As long as it has fairness in the process, it's fine. If it doesn't we will audit and re-evaluate it's role.
@93H8MR42yrs2Y
@932ZRYN2yrs2Y
Would need to know more about this
@8ZTSR7D2yrs2Y
Not knowledgeable enough to answer.
@8ZT5SNW2yrs2Y
No, there are many flaws that need to be addressed instead of increasing funding
@8VSVZSD3yrs3Y
There need to be stricter guidelines and increasing the budget isn't going to do that.
@8VHFQYB3yrs3Y
Keep the funding at the same level.
@928X97S2yrs2Y
Review for redundancies and streamline to ensure the organization is not top heavy.
@8VJ8ZRD3yrs3Y
No Decrease but keep what's in place now
@8VBTBZ53yrs3Y
@8VBDV4SNew Democratic3yrs3Y
No, I am satisfied with the current amount of funding
@8TXCC9Y3yrs3Y
@8QQRCMVLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes as long as the government can provide evidence that the funding is actually going to this
@8QFCQGTNew Democratic3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should conduct a review on the morality and effectiveness of the CSA and standards should be set before funding increases can happen.
@8QDRPS8New Democratic3yrs3Y
Yes, CSA funding should be increased but in return it must play its role accurately on monitoring internal and external products and much press on monitoring the industries and restaurants.
@8Q28BQH3yrs3Y
I dont understand the question
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
