Do you support the Northern Gateway pipeline project?

Yes, assuming all measures can be taken to ensure reduced impact on the environment and affected communities.

Yes, as long as the corporations building the pipeline and operating the pipeline have UNLIMITED LIABILITY and either sufficient assets or bonding in place to clean up an environmental disaster. If the cost of the potential loss or bonding is prohibitive, then this is a market force that will drive stakeholders to alternatives.

I do support it but at the same time I don't, i'm in the middle. I say this because this is a good idea but what if it breaks or leaks and there is a lot of money going into it.

Yes, energy sources should be diversified to include both renewable sources, and safe transportation on existing fuel sources. While there needs to be a significant increase in the development of renewable energy infrastructure, this project had to be seen to completion to avoid wasteful financial penalties for breaking contract agreements.

Yes- canadian oil and gas projects are at least properly regulated, and workers are fairly compensated.. Our appetite and reliance is far too great to prohibit these projects while accepting oil and gas from overseas. However, our efforts should be focused on reducing reliance on oil and fas altogether.

Somewhat- canadian oil and gas projects are at least properly regulated, and workers are fairly compensated.. Our appetite and reliance is far too great to prohibit these projects while accepting oil and gas from overseas. However, our efforts should be focused on reducing reliance on oil and fas altogether.

Yes, its good for the economy and social welfare, but make sure that they fully meet the environmental standards to preserve wildlife.

yes, but take steps to do less harm to ecosystems and the indigenous communities, even if the cost is higher

The 'learn more' doesn't help understanding.

do not have enough info to answer.

I'm unsure of what that is.

No, I do not support natural gas usage

I am uneducated on the subject

I dont even know what that is

No, we should move away from oil because it negatively affects the environment and people. Anything that affects the land should be decided by Indigenous people

Yes, but bypass aboriginal lands

I don't really know how to answer this

No, it's bad for the people who live there

I see both sides.

As long as it's not infringing on other people's territory, then yes.

Yes but make sure it is inspected by a third party every month

Yes, but should be nationalized

Yes because it helps the economy and created more jobs

Don’t really want it

Don’t support neither support

I think pipelines are also not great for the environment and installation is hard but the other option is no better

Yes, if first nations are consulted first, and we go for LNG pipelines instead for social and economic benefits

don't quite know about it.

Go east first

A pipeline should be built for more efficient and clean transport of natural gas until other energy alternatives are created. The construction of the pipeline should be built with input and influence from Indigenous communities.

No. We shouldn't sell our oil to China. If we are selling it to Taiwan or another Asian countries that share our interests, then yes.

Not informed enough on this topic.

Depends on if it becomes sustainable and safe for all parties concerned

yes, according to me it is very helpful project for society as it provides many benefits to society.

as long as they are held acountable to the comunities that are most effected

Dk what this is

Yes, this was cancelled based solely on political expediency. The vast majority of native bands supported this and no single native band should hold a veto on any endeavour. Canadian oil is the least polluting in the world and we will need oil for modern life for many decades..

Yes, but nationalize the energy sector and redistribute profits as dividends to all Canadian citizens. Canadian resources belong to all Canadians, not multinational corporations.

Not a governmental concern.

no. this is a step backwards and will only make climate change worse by promoting the use of fossil fuels.

As long as it does not affect old growth forests

Conflicted on this issue

No, bitumen should not be transported by ship especially in such a treacherous and sensitive environment

Yes, but only with agreements between all parties being formalized, including Aboriginal bands and strict penalties for non-adherence or future failures causing environmental harm or damage.

No, This hurts the multiple years of our national human societal race that came from more important backgrounds than worthless whole whites, also yeah aboriginals should have something to decide as such as us as well.

Yes, as long as it provides serious environmental risks, especially to those in Aboriginal communities

The premise should seek the opinions of more residents.

Only when the majority of aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it

No, we should not build any new pipelines and instead fund renewable energy projects while slowly fading out our oil industry.