Try the political quiz

135 Replies

 @5F34FF9from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Make the mother carry the child to full term and give the child away.

 @98R9SGBfrom Washington commented…1yr1Y

Abortion should be banned unconditionally, as it is morally detrimental to Canada and a blatant and hitleresque butchery that is worse than slavery and like it must be abolished.

 @5BZLJGQfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, but include men in the process, because men don't have a say in the matter. When in the early stages of a pregnancy and there is a common knowledge that the man does not want a child, but woman does then she becomes fully responsible for that choice.

 @5FXV3J3Conservativefrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T3T55PConservativefrom Ontario commented…3yrs3Y

Pro life because logically a fetus is a living human from conception onwards because they have their own unique DNA. There is no other distinction to make between a fetus and a born human. You can’t justify abortion without justifying murder if you think it though. No human should be able to choose to kill another human. A fetus has the right tho live even though it’s inconvenient. 100%

 @8HQW577from Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

i dont agree with it at all and it shouldnt be alloud, you got pregnant you deal with it

 @8PPLF2TNew Democraticfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Abortions ought to be legal, however, Males ought to be held to much more account for the abortions.. Unwanted Pregnancies are 99% the fault of the Male, therefore, after being found responsible for 3 abortions, that Male must undergo a vasectomy and be barred from starting a family later on. - IF WE ARE TO BE SERIOUS ABOUT THIS.. we must take serious actions. Males are inherently irresponsible.. and are left to go thru life totally unaffected by their choices, while society destroys that female for it. - this is completely unfair, unjust and barbaric.

 @8ZMTC6Nfrom British Columbia answered…2yrs2Y

 @9283TWLfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZZGWP2from Alberta answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-Choice, Should not be used as a form of birth control and should not be taxpayer funded unless it is for a medica issue

 @96QW3ZWfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

 @96QT3H5from British Columbia answered…2yrs2Y

Bro, lets put a limit of 3 times abortion on it , excluding rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child moments (we wont count that as in the 3 times , u still get 3 times that you can use at your disposal.

 @8VRF6R9from British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Pro choice. On demand. Free at point of service. Access in all provinces mandated by federal government. Abortion is healthcare and shouldn’t be denied.

  @Conservative-from-Canadafrom California commented…1yr1Y

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months. Prior to 1969, inducing an abortion was a crime under Section 251 of the Criminal Code. The maximum penalty for a doctor, or anyone else assisting a woman to end her pregnancy, was life. Then and today, abortion has remained a divisive moral and political issue. It is condemned on one side by “pro-life” advocates, who seek to defend the unborn child; it is supported on the other by “pro-choice” advocates. In 1990, the House of Commons voted in Favour (140–131) of a new law. Introduced by the Progressive Conservati…  Read more

 @8G8D5GZfrom Saskatchewan answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, but increase the government subsidies and support for child-bearing women and single mothers.

 @8SKS8J9from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life, but the most effective way to limit abortion and increase quality of life of children is providing birth control, sex education, and more social services

 @8PVGNQSfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Pro life, but allow in the case of in the case of rape, incest, danger to mother or child, age, or not having the funds to raise a child in a healthy house hold

 @8PRDTB5Liberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Do not have a firm stance on either sides since I can not relate to any hardships that would come for a person that would consider this option however I personally lean towards pro-life.

 @8KG8JBJConservativefrom British Columbia answered…4yrs4Y

Taking away someone's life is not your decision to make, even as their mother. If you cannot support your child or for whatever reason, you do not want it, then consider your options and receive a consultation with a professional. There are so many other options, such as open and closed adoption (wither you want to stay in contact and be able to see the child in their future or want nothing to do with them), direct placement adoption (you can pick out a family best suited for you child), agency adoption (letting an adoption facility take care of your child's placement in a new home,…  Read more

 @8G3ZC5DNew Democraticfrom Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

D social supports should be put into place so that this is no longer an issue.

 @8DNNPCZfrom Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

i do not agree with abortion. Because after all, it is still my child, even if i do not know whether it is my husband's child or being raped, i still carry the baby because them have my blood drop. if i had an abortion, is mean i just killed someone.

 @8MRPD4V from British Columbia commented…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

Neither pro-life nor pro-choice

Ban after first three months

Prioritize access to lower income group while the rich should pay for the procedure

Provide sex education

Minors: parental notification except in cases of child abuse

Mandatory embryo screening & 24-48 hr waiting period

Providing support to pregnant people so they won’t be forced to have an abortion just to hide their sexual activity

Since fathers are also responsible for raising the child, they should have a say over the decision, except in cases of suspected rape and abuse. However, they must also pay child support (The government can help pay a part of it if they can’t afford it)

 @96Z72XKfrom British Columbia answered…1yr1Y

Most people shouldn't be having kids to begin with. Pro-abortion, not life.

 @9724JDTfrom Kentucky disagreed…1yr1Y

Shouldn't be having kids? I know overpopulation is a problem, but this is an extreme overreaction, and a very bitter view on life. And come on, killing a baby is murder, but a few months earlier and it's fine WTF??

 @8F6M3RDfrom Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

you shouldnt be aloud to abord your children

 @8VD33LNfrom Manitoba commented…3yrs3Y

Pro-life Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months

*abort

 @8VD33LNfrom Manitoba commented…3yrs3Y

 @9LJGNWTPeople’s from British Columbia answered…2wks2W

I am pro-life in general but understand that incest is a horrible situation for both the female and the fetus as it may lead to congenital defects. I also think rape is horrible and rapists should be killed by the victim or sent up for life but the fetus is innocent. It's a decision that the woman must make and eventually answer to God.

 @9LC5HMJNew Democraticfrom Ontario answered…3wks3W

Pro-life, but allow in cases o rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child and also Pro-choice,but ban after the first three months

 @9LBVQD4from Ontario answered…3wks3W

those not capable of caring for children shouldn't be able to have them, therefore less abortions would be needed

 @9L36MC5Conservativefrom Ontario answered…1mo1MO

If a woman is raped and gets pregnant I believe she should be allowed to get an abortion. However if a woman gets pregnant to her husband I believe she should not get a abortion

 @9KZL3X7from Nova Scotia answered…1mo1MO

me personally i dont agree on it, if you were rap you shpuld get theropy to deal wit it during your pregnany and after for yourself and to learn to lety that pain go and to feel better but after you should give it up after.

 @9KW5CDKfrom Ontario answered…1mo1MO

it depends on person to person. i agree to allow in case of rape or danger to mother or child. Also if someone is not ready to take responsibility at that time so they can abort it.

 @9KF8335from British Columbia answered…2mos2MO

pro choice but the father may not be held accountable for a non abortions' if he was in favor of the abortion

 @9KDWGTJfrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

I am pro life but I also think some situations need an abortion, having a kid too young, rape, incest, etc. those are the cases where abortion is acceptable in my opinion

 @9K72PYHNew Democraticfrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

Let women who can have children vote. And the remainder of us accept the outcome. Renew vote every 10 years.

 @9K622FNfrom Alberta answered…2mos2MO

It's sad but understandable. If a parent can't afford their baby, what choice do they have? It's their choice, their life.

 @9K4MLQ8Conservativefrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

keep the kid, people have said they have found life on mars, but a human baby doesn't count as life how it that ok?

 @9JWKZRSfrom British Columbia answered…2mos2MO

i support the choice to pick abortion or not but both parents must choose together, no one with more or less say in the matter, unless in the case of rape or incest.

 @9JWFXKRfrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

I am both, i think that life should be protected but the government should not have the ability control what people do.

 @9JV5LCX from New Brunswick answered…3mos3MO

Pro-Smart-Choice, Allow free abortions on rape, incest, danger to the mother, pregnancy of under-aged 15 or younger minors. Allow up to 3 free abortions, more than that are paid by the mother.
Provide free surgery for the small operation to pinch the canals to prevent pregnancy if desired.
Provide rebates on birth control, condoms, contraceptive, sex education for 16 and older only.

 @9JTPJVFfrom Saskatchewan answered…3mos3MO

Pro-life, but allow if medically required to save mother. Have counselling and help for victims of in justice

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...