सरकार फोन और ईमेल की निगरानी करने में सक्षम होना चाहिए?

आपके डिजिटल पदचिह्न की निगरानी की संभावना सरकार में आपकी स्वतंत्रता और विश्वास की भावना को कैसे प्रभावित करती है?

यदि इससे आतंकवादी कृत्यों में उल्लेखनीय कमी आती है तो क्या आप अधिक सरकारी निगरानी स्वीकार करेंगे?

यदि आपकी सुरक्षा खतरे में होती, तो क्या आप कुछ गोपनीयता छोड़ने को तैयार होते, और आप सीमा कहाँ खींचते हैं?

क्या किसी अनजान व्यक्ति द्वारा आपको देखे जाने या सुने जाने का विचार आपको असहज कर देता है, और क्यों?

अपने जीवन की एक खुली किताब के रूप में कल्पना करें; यह आपके ऑनलाइन संचार करने के तरीके को कैसे बदल देगा?

यदि आपको पता चले कि संभावित अपराधों को रोकने के लिए आपके व्यक्तिगत संदेशों की निगरानी की जा रही है तो आप क्या करेंगे?

कब, यदि कभी, क्या आप मानते हैं कि निगरानी के लाभ निजता के अधिकार से अधिक हैं?

अगर राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा के लिए आपकी सहमति के बिना आपकी निजी बातचीत सुनी जाए तो आपको कैसा लगेगा?

क्या आपको कभी ऐसा महसूस हुआ है कि आपकी गोपनीयता से समझौता किया गया है, और यदि हां, तो उस आक्रमण की सीमा क्या होनी चाहिए?

Yes, but only under the scrutiny of the courts where necessary to protect citizens either collectively or individually

No, not at all. I think phone calls and emails should be private. It is not other peoples business and they don't need to know what we are talking about.

Only in severe circumstances where national security is threatened.

They should only be able to monitor people who have been identified as a threat, and only by court order

I say 'no', but only because I see a growing society that has less and less respect for the 'Honour system' and I believe that even though this may be an important tool to protect against suspected crimes of terrorism, it will be abused and misused.

if this was an ironclad method to reduce terrorism, then yes. otherwise, this is an invasion of privacy

I feel like the federal government should be allowed to monitor emails and phone calls that are flagged with key words that insinuate a possible terrorist or illegal act.

I find this to be a ridiculous notion. Under certain circumstances it would be permissible but its a blatant intrusion of privacy and completely unnecessary. A acceptable situation is someone suspected for crimes, but just monitoring people for the sake of doing so is completely illogical.

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, It is the citizens responsibility to protect the country in this case since the government cannot possibly handle everything and proper education provided on the subject in schools on a side note they are taught in a way that does not create future paranoia. Once a threat is flagged by citizens only then should authority intervene. Immigrants will have to be under surveillance for as long their education into citizenship is provided, and Immigrants with a history of violence or fraud will not be allowed into the country.

I'm torn...I am concerned with the federal government having cart blanche access to private information, yet I am for being able to prevent acts that negatively harm groups of innocent people.

Yes but only with a court order or a percieved threat

Yes, after proving that the act is necessary for National security, and combating organized crime and child pornography