32% Yes |
68% No |
20% Yes |
64% No |
10% Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated |
2% No, do not build the pipeline but allow oil production in the tar sands |
2% Yes, the pipeline is necessary for the economic future of Canada |
2% No, do not build the pipeline and shut down all oil production in the tar sands |
See how support for each position on “Keystone Pipeline” has changed over time for 683k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Keystone Pipeline” has changed over time for 683k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8VVTY6N3yrs3Y
If people don’t want to sell the land go around? Government can piss off
@8NVWKMV3yrs3Y
Allow the pipeline by seeking consent from landlords and revive oil sands! Allow oil production in oil sands.
@8VJ7MXZ3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if they consent and are compensated for it
@9L8JRVW2wks2W
Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated AND that's if the pipeline even goes through to begin with.
@9JZP7TY2mos2MO
Only if there are no alternative solutions and only if the property owners are fairly compensated. the economy is important for the future of Canadians
@9JQ8T5J2mos2MO
Not, not unless the landowners are fairly compensated & all Indigenous communities in the area agree.
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
