No

nuclear energy is clean, effective, cost-efficient, and safer. For Canada to grow it will need energy and as of present Nuclear is our best option

If i were to research how many people had severe injuries whilst on the job of a nuclear power plant it would be quite large as opposed work-related injuries on other jobs of energy powered.

Nuclear energy is a good choice but also has opposing factors such as radioactive waste and limited fuel supply

Nuclear Energy is a big reliable source of energy. We will one day run out of gas for our cars and machines, plus the carbon they produce are very bad. Nuclear energy sources can be safe with more research.

I believe we should increase military power but definitely not nuclear, because nuclear energy may destroy us and the world

If Canada ends up in a situation where we are importing other resources and that country gets in war wee will be left with nothing then we will have to resort to nuclear energy.

Without the use of nuclear energy there would not be enough power to create alternative energy sources, we must rely on nuclear energy temporarily until conditions for more renewable energy sources are readily available

Nuclear energy is pretty clean (actually pretty safe - most meltdowns are caused by human error) and it provides lots of power. This will

While it's cheap to use it can be very dangerous to us and our environment it could end up leaking or it could explode which will radiate our plant or causing toxic chemicals in the air.

Nuclear accidents are the main thing people are afraid of. If you look at the numbers, nuclear accidents happen way less than other accidents. Nuclear also causes less deaths per unit of energy produced

Nuclear energy is both good for the environment as well as moderately safe with there being only 3 major events caused by poor management and bad equipment. In the end it’s just a cleaner more efficient energy criminalized due to shotty power plants

Because the nuclear energy can end up exploding or leaking, which now means that toxic chemicals are in the air and end up causing an explosion or radiating the planet.

It is soooo much better than pumping smog into the air. It’s also extremely efficient, and dispite Chernobyl exploding 45 years ago, nuclear meltdown are extremely unlikely.

When there is an accient in any part of a Nucleer Energy Plant it could cause incident like the Chernobly Explosion and The Three Mile Island Incident.

The Government of Canada's point of view is, therefore, that nuclear disarmament must be sought in a concerted and non-unilateral manner, that civilian nuclear power, implemented with the greatest safety, security and non-proliferation measures, is an important part of the energy mix, and studies indicate that the reliance on nuclear energy will be necessary to achieve carbon neutrality in time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Nuclear will be needed for

https://www.international.gc.ca/country_news-pays_nouvelles/2022-10-04-france.aspx?lang=eng

It is very very dangerous and can ruin people’s lives and create serious health problems, as well as the chance of them blowing up and destroying communities

There is a lot of misinformation and fear surrounding nuclear power but it is a clean energy source that will help us until we can fully transition to green energy.

you guys should agree with me because think about it if something happen a nuclear bobm could be set off and white out more than half the city

Nuclear energy is proven to be both a safe and clean form of energy generation. There is virtually no carbon emissions. It is efficient.with effective management, there is little risk of adverse effects

You are completely brain-dead if you're against nuclear energy. More sustainable energy makes the left happy, and buying less oil from Afghanistan will make the right happy. I don't see any downsides to having more cheap sustainable energy.

Nuclear Energy is one of the cleanest and most efficient sources of energy that modern technology can possibly produce. In fact, fossil and coal fuel has caused more deaths than nuclear power plants. I do acknowledge that nuclear power plants ,if gone wrong, can cause serious damage, but fossil and coal fuel causes much more damage regardless if something goes wrong. Coal and fossil power is simply more damaging than nuclear power. Coal and fossil waste are also produced more frequently than nuclear waste and has more lasting damage than nuclear waste.

Nuclear waste can be safely contained, buried, and loses its energy over time, rendering it nearly harmless. Coal and fossil waste cause long-lasting damage. A good example of the damage coal and fossil waste have created is climate change.

Nuclear Energy represents our best chance at efficient energy production without being reliant on Russia and minimizing emissions.

Nuclear energy is actually quite safe, past Nuclear accidents have been caused by neglect and bad reactor design.

nuclear bombs are very dangerous and should not be used since they only destroy the planet and nuclear

Nuclear is the cleanest and most efficient energy source we know. Solar and wind simply doesn't provide the level of energy required to sustain our way of life. Per capita, less people die from nuclear energy and related accidents compared to other forms of energy.

It is cleaner for society and all major accidents were from faulty and unchecked equipment, and those were 1 in a trillion

Nuclear energy is efficient, safe, and could help us cut out fossil fuel usage. The only reason most people are afraid of using nuclear power plants is because of previous incidents caused by incompetency, faulty equipment, and outdated equipment. Nowadays they are managed very well and most incidents that have happened in the past are not repeatable.

Nuclear is way more efficient and effective then fossil fuels and as long as we follow the safety requirements and regulations we'll be good.