Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @9LJGNWTPeople’s from British Columbia answered…2wks2W

Yes, ONLY if all chemicals used in the process can be recovered, stripped out of wastewater and the water used put back to potable conditions. If not, then this again is a market force that will either promote conservation, recovery, alternative fuel sources, methods or importation of fuels from elsewhere.

 @9L7D6G4from Alberta answered…4wks4W

Yes, however it should be done with consideration of various factors such as human population, wild life and other life sustaining resources.

 @9GYSNHDfrom Nova Scotia answered…5mos5MO

No, we should pursue more sustainable resource energy instead and study the long term effects fracking that was already inflicted on the land, particularly in relation to earthquakes.

 @9B3CMGVfrom British Columbia answered…1yr1Y

Combination of both: we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead and studying the long-term effects fracking that was already inflicted on the land, particularly in relation to earthquakes.

 @99PP8NPLiberalfrom Nova Scotia answered…1yr1Y

i think it should be used only as necessary, and we should switch to renewable energy soon

 @99GY2ZMfrom Alberta answered…1yr1Y

I don’t know cause I don’t know what hydraulic freckling even is

 @98PQCX9from British Columbia answered…1yr1Y

 @98NL724from Ontario answered…1yr1Y

yes, If we use more sustainable resources CO2 emissions will decrease

 @9864788from Vermont answered…1yr1Y

Oil should be kept in reserve for emergency uses, as it is a finite source of energy.

 @97T4JZCConservativefrom Ontario answered…1yr1Y

Not in heavily populated areas, some LNG only, and temporary until we find better sustainable renewables or incentivize for more sustainable renewables to pursue. More research is definitely needed, avoid oil as much as possible

 @97JL3NKfrom British Columbia answered…1yr1Y

 @96QP3KDfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

i dont want their racking fluid in my drinking water and if the locals feel the same then they should have the right to kick them out

 @95PHJZ8from Alberta answered…2yrs2Y

 @945L3BVfrom Saskatchewan answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but different renewable energy resources should be explored and experimented with frequently in order to phase put fracking

 @9388XWJfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

as long as they are held acountable to the communities that are most effected

 @92JJNYMfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but nationalize the energy sector and redistribute profits as dividends to all Canadian citizens. Canadian resources belong to all Canadians, not multinational corporations.

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta answered…8mos8MO

No, this is unsustainable and wrecks havoc on the environment We need clean energy.

 @9D6Y4C5answered…9mos9MO

 @8YSH4R2from Quebec answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but only temporarily to transition to renewables and more research is needed for its long term effects

 @8XKLV73from Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but there needs to be an initiative to switch to sustainable energy sources, and there should be research on the effects of fracking.

 @8XJ8R6Vfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

 @8VV2P57from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

No, we should pursue more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy resources instead

 @8VRD278from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VQYSS9Greenfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y3NCLYfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

Yes as long as the company is held accountable to the communities their harming the most

 @8XZYC7Yfrom Ontario answered…2yrs2Y

I would say Yes as long as the communities that are most harmed have the most say in weather to keep the pipeline project going. These projects have a poor history and they need to be held accountable to their actions if they are to improve as a company

 @8VMWNKXfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only until there are more sustainable options constitantly avaliable

 @8V95QN2from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

This would depend on the circumstances the country is facing. Only frack if there is no other option in your province. Leave this up to communities to decide.

 @8V7LPJXfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Only if every part of the product can be used in some sort of consumption. Also committing to cut waste by 10 % /yr and contributing to clean alternatives

 @8TTYSTMfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TTCZCYfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TNDXCTfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, increase oversight and nationalize the industry only after doing long-term research of effects of fracking.

 @8TN4GLWfrom Quebec answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TM8L3Wfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Neither yes nor no. Maintain status quo until further long- term empirical studies have been conducted to scientific standards.

 @8TLWKBHfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead, and more research is needed to measure the long-term effects of fracking!

 @8S2VZ56Liberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RXLK45from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but the increase in oversight is needed and not in heavily populated areas.

 @8RWBHS3from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RVZKZNLiberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

I don't understand this question so I don't think I would have an accurate opinion.

 @8RVXCRGfrom Manitoba answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RQTCTZLiberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

It’s bad for the environment but it would be a heavy loss of jobs. Oil is necessary currently until there is another alternative. Maybe for x amount of oil produced have x amount of trees replanted.

 @8RJ5L74from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8R9YBHVfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but there needs to be a higher level of environmental safety to the earth

 @8R9NRYDfrom Manitoba answered…3yrs3Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...