Should critical race theory be taught in K-12 education?

It should be taught as one point of view and methodology, but other views of race and institutionalism should be taught.

No, it may depend on the school if they like to teach it, or recommend it.

critical race theory is a law school course and is not being taught in k-12 schools stop falling for this fox news propaganda

it should be choosable

CRT is NOT taught in k-12 schools. It is a graduate level theory of how race and the law intersect. Stop using Republican buzz words as if they are valid!

No, unless it’s as an elective

No, or at least without parental consent. The last thing any child needs is to feel guilt or hate towards their own skin color.

No, but students should not be shielded from learning about racial issues

This question is phrased so poorly and it is clear that whoever wrote the question, the "Learn More" section, and the answers has a clear misunderstanding of what critical race theory even means, as well as a misunderstanding of what anyone's stance on the subject is. This question is somewhat topical and should be asked on this quiz, but needs to be significantly rewritten.

It's not taught in schools.

CRT is not taught anywhere except for law schools. Republicans are using this as a point to gain white voters (it is working). However, I do think CRT should be taught.

Only at a mature age 10-12 grade

What role should personal stories and experiences play in classroom conversations about race and society?

NO, This can only cause/create a bigger riff for people, there should be other ways to educate this nut not in the way described.

If you had learned about systemic racism earlier in your education, how do you think it would have influenced your views on justice and equality?

How might including discussions about race in schools help us address and potentially solve real-world issues of inequality?

Critical Race Theory, as I understand it, is reserved for university students (mostly pre-law)

Imagine a classroom without discussions on race—how does this compare to one that openly talks about racial issues, and what are the potential outcomes of each?

In what ways could understanding different racial experiences contribute to a more inclusive school environment for everyone?

What fears or concerns might people have about discussing race and its effects in education, and how could these be respectfully addressed?

No, critical race theory is inaccurate and wouldn't be the proper method to address dark points in our nation.

No, but it is currently not taught in K-12

This is irrelevant as critical race theory is a law school topic and is not taught on the k-12 level

No, and make that dishonest and racist propaganda illegal.

Yes, along with many other stances.

CRT is inherently racist, dividing the population into oppressed and oppressor.

I think kids should learn about racism but learn about it in a negative way and learn that everyone is the same and arent to be discriminated because of the color skin.

Yes, but age-based context provided to students as it relates to the real world. It should not be a zero-sum that you are either inherently racist or inherently disadvantaged because it degrades both parties regardless of their personal situations. Carefully articulated context and critical thought processes should be utilized in explaining things.

No because this in a non-issue fabricated by the right. CRT is a college level concept that is not, and never has been, taught in k-12

Yes, but allow families to opt-out of it

Race theory is constructed by whiteness and should be abolished. But history and culture should still be taught

How would learning about the impact of race on society change your perspective on history and current events?

What role should personal stories and experiences play in classroom conversations about race and society?

Yes, but only as an elective for teenagers

Teach the history of African Americans but do not forget that no one is born racist. People become racist.

My view when it comes to K-12 education, tell it how it actually happened. No Intersectionality, no IDpolism, no jingoism, just straight raw facts about the history of our country from the hunter-gatherers at the Bering Strait to the most possible recent times.

It should be up to each individual school district to decide

Teach history but do not claim that every white person is racist.

Yes, but only if we acknowledge that humans regardless of culture, skin color, political ideology, religious beliefs etc. have been both peaceful and violent with each other.

No, nothing which could influence the political, philosophical, or religious beliefs of a child should be taught in K-12 education

Critical Race theory is not taught in K-12 Education. This question is not relevant.

It depends on how critical race theory is taught. If it is taught through a nuanced and comprehensive lens and American institutions, laws, and history that are not inherently racist are not labeled racist in the classroom, I will more likely support it.

No, critical race theory leads to division amongst the people based on the color of their skin.

Yes, but not by force of government. Schools can decide.

No, students should be taught the facts and be allowed to determine their own meanings from the facts.

No, because CRT is a graduate-level concept and is not appropriate at the K-12 level. But students should be made aware of the historical foundations for some of the major problems we have in contemporary US.

How can teachers ensure that discussions about race are both informative and sensitive to students' diverse experiences?

No, critical race theory is false.

The Frankfurt School's Critical Theories do a great deal to avoid "class analysis" of race (and other) issues, while centering race itself. It's unscientific and it's used to weaken class warfare. It's used to divide the proletariat.

No, but they should be taught about racial and cultural struggles in society to acknowledge the plight of minorities in America.

No, it is not developmentally appropriate to teach graduate-level concepts at the K-12 level.

Critical Race Theory is not taught at the K-12 level

No, not as currently practiced; CRT needs to be reformed to respect honest analysis over narrative.

Yes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist

No, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin

Yes, and also add Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum

This question is stupid and divisive because most people in the USA don't even know what CRT even is. It isn't taught in K-12 now and it is too complicated of a topic for K-12. Do away with the whitewashing of American History and include the systemic racism that has always been part of American History. Teach kids to be media literate and how to think critically rather than trying to politicize CRT by feeding people an incorrect definition.

Yes

Yes, but CRT needs to be legally defined and limited to historical contexts

No, their too little to fully understand the problem and there are much more important, crucial skills they need to learn and focus on at an early age.

students should be taught this but in a way that doesn't make them treat people differently

Can education about historical injustices help students develop empathy, and how might that impact their relationships with classmates of different backgrounds?

Yes and no. I'd say that history should be taught in full, however unless the class is specifically made for these discussions than they shouldn't have to talk about it.

How can teachers ensure that discussions about race are both informative and sensitive to students' diverse experiences?

no our students need the correct history. we need to teach discipline and personal responsibility.

Imagine a classroom without discussions on race—how does this compare to one that openly talks about racial issues, and what are the potential outcomes of each?

If you had learned about systemic racism earlier in your education, how do you think it would have influenced your views on justice and equality?

How would learning about the impact of race on society change your perspective on history and current events?

How can learning about the ongoing effects of racial history empower students to become active participants in creating a more equitable future?

What fears or concerns might people have about discussing race and its effects in education, and how could these be respectfully addressed?

In what ways could understanding different racial experiences contribute to a more inclusive school environment for everyone?

Can education about historical injustices help students develop empathy, and how might that impact their relationships with classmates of different backgrounds?

No but we should teach children that the Democratic Party is inherently racist.

Yes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist, but we should start to introduce this after they have reached adulthood and gained the ability of critical thinking.

Yes, and we should start at a young age in an appropriate manner.

No, but we should make sure to reach our children to tolerate others regardless of what they look like and instead judge others based on their character and to simply treat others the way we want to be treated

No, but this is a non issue. CRT is a niche Academic subject. Government should not get involved with academia. period.

No, but only because CRT is a graduate-level law course. Kids should still be taught the unadulterated truth about our country though. Our history should not be whitewashed in schools.

Kids should understand what's bad about racism and why, at the earliest age possible. If we don't teach our kids about racism at 5 years old, trying to teach them about it at 15, is damn near impossible. I couldn't drive til I was 17, but I was taught how to drive at 12.

Should it be taught as truth? No. Should it be proposed as a potential cause for social tension? Yes.

They can be, but we avoid incendiary language and speak accurately about what CRT is when doing so. For example, this website uses an incorrect definition of Critical Race Theory.

Yes, but not until they are in college

This question poses an unfair dichotomy. While I don't believe CRT should be taught, I do believe institutional and intrapersonal racism must be addressed in K-12.

yes, maybe not at such a a young age but kids should also be taught that they are all equal as a person.

I really don't understand this question

Regardless, this should be decided by individual schools, not the government.

It should be offered as extra credit only if the parents vote it in.

No, dont bring up racism and people wont be racists.

Yes, but without the white shame dogma that tends to circulate.

Kids should be educated about racism and its effects on society, but should not be taught that anyone is inherently racist.

i don't get what this means

No, critical race theory is a high level legal theory that is standard in law schools.

Critical Race Theory is not taught in K-12 education.

No, but teach that being of certain races have more chance of certain outcomes.

‘Critical Race Theory’ as a term misrepresents what activists want to add to the curriculum.

it shouldn't matter what race you are

yes to teach the diciplinary actions that will be cause if that happenes

No and ban CRT

How can learning about the ongoing effects of racial history empower students to become active participants in creating a more equitable future?