5 stati americani hanno approvato leggi che richiedono destinatari di assistenza sociale per essere testati per i farmaci. Canada attualmente non prova beneficiari dell’assistenza sociale per i farmaci. I fautori sostengono che i test impedirà fondi pubblici siano utilizzati per sovvenzionare farmaci abitudini e contribuire ad ottenere un trattamento per coloro che sono dipendenti da droghe. Gli oppositori sostengono che si tratta di uno spreco di denaro dal momento che i test costerà più soldi che risparmiano.
@3CMZ7BH3 anni3Y
yes. surprise random tests once or twice a year made to get help before they get another check
@3CMSX2HConservatore3 anni3Y
No this is a waste of time and money and social assistance programs should come with restrictions and time limits such as EI.
@3CLFQR23 anni3Y
No, people matter no matter what their transgressions. They should however be given support to keep drugs from hurting them further.
@3CK8W453 anni3Y
Welfare checks should be replaced with payment direct to landlords and with food voucher, transit passes or gas cards, and a small amount of cash for communication and other needs. Take the majority of cash out of the equation. Then those on welfare and on drugs either give drugs up or turn to crime and they can be dealt with separately; and people just having hard times have a way to survive.
@3CJXBWT3 anni3Y
No, an unconditional basic income should be adopted
@3CJV6993 anni3Y
Yes but only terminate for hard drugs and provide treatment
