@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In un’era digitale piena di minacce, la privacy dovrebbe ancora essere considerata un diritto inalienabile?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In che modo la possibilità di monitorare la tua impronta digitale influisce sul tuo senso di libertà e fiducia nel governo?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Accetteresti una maggiore sorveglianza da parte del governo se diminuisse significativamente gli atti di terrorismo?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Se fosse in gioco la tua sicurezza, saresti disposto a rinunciare a un po’ di privacy, e dove tracci il limite?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Il pensiero di essere guardato o ascoltato da qualcuno che non conosci ti mette a disagio, e perché?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Immagina la tua vita come un libro aperto; come cambierebbe il modo in cui comunichi online?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Cosa faresti se scoprissi che i tuoi messaggi personali vengono monitorati per prevenire potenziali crimini?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Quando, se mai, ritieni che i benefici della sorveglianza superino il diritto alla privacy?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Come ti sentiresti se le tue conversazioni personali venissero ascoltate senza il tuo consenso per la sicurezza nazionale?
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Hai mai avuto la sensazione che la tua privacy fosse compromessa e, in tal caso, quali dovrebbero essere i limiti di tale invasione?
@3BGPRHR3 anni3Y
Yes, but only under the scrutiny of the courts where necessary to protect citizens either collectively or individually
@3BGP2KN3 anni3Y
No, not at all. I think phone calls and emails should be private. It is not other peoples business and they don't need to know what we are talking about.
@3BGMGP73 anni3Y
Only in severe circumstances where national security is threatened.
@3BGLWPV3 anni3Y
They should only be able to monitor people who have been identified as a threat, and only by court order
@3BDL75V3 anni3Y
I say 'no', but only because I see a growing society that has less and less respect for the 'Honour system' and I believe that even though this may be an important tool to protect against suspected crimes of terrorism, it will be abused and misused.
@3BD78GZConservatore3 anni3Y
if this was an ironclad method to reduce terrorism, then yes. otherwise, this is an invasion of privacy
@3BCM9WC3 anni3Y
I feel like the federal government should be allowed to monitor emails and phone calls that are flagged with key words that insinuate a possible terrorist or illegal act.
@3BC5V7K3 anni3Y
I find this to be a ridiculous notion. Under certain circumstances it would be permissible but its a blatant intrusion of privacy and completely unnecessary. A acceptable situation is someone suspected for crimes, but just monitoring people for the sake of doing so is completely illogical.
@3BC2FSD3 anni3Y
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, It is the citizens responsibility to protect the country in this case since the government cannot possibly handle everything and proper education provided on the subject in schools on a side note they are taught in a way that does not create future paranoia. Once a threat is flagged by citizens only then should authority intervene. Immigrants will have to be under surveillance for as long their education into citizenship is provided, and Immigrants with a history of violence or fraud will not be allowed into the country.
@3BBWFYN3 anni3Y
I'm torn...I am concerned with the federal government having cart blanche access to private information, yet I am for being able to prevent acts that negatively harm groups of innocent people.
@M553243 anni3Y
Yes but only with a court order or a percieved threat
@M3FKP23 anni3Y
Yes, after proving that the act is necessary for National security, and combating organized crime and child pornography