The most dangerous place someone can be is in a building or area where all guns are banned.
That is not true, nor is there any such evidence to support that.
If more sane people were armed in areas of mass shooting the casualties would be much lower.
Crossfire in a public place is not a good, or even working, solution. And again, this isn't even true, nor is there any evidence to support it. In fact, according to statistics from the US Department of Justice, places with armed security are actually less safe: "Results are presented as incident rate ratios in Table 2 and show armed guards were not associated with significant reduction in rates of injuries; in fact, controlling for the aforementioned factors of location and school characteristics, the rate of deaths was 2.83 times greater in schools with an armed guard present".
And disarming or defunding or taking whatever resources away from the police is just dumb.
No, it's a good thing that is meant to reduce the unnecessarily detrimental effects that police militarization and oppression has over our communities.
They should all be able to easily be able to physically control the average American.
That's not a good thing...
Sii il primo a rispondere a questa disaccordo .