電話やメールを政府が監視できるようにすべきですか?

自分のデジタル フットプリントが監視される可能性は、自由の感覚や政府への信頼にどのような影響を与えますか?

政府の監視強化によってテロ行為が大幅に減少した場合、あなたはそれを受け入れますか?

あなたの安全が危険にさらされている場合、あなたはプライバシーをある程度放棄しますか?どこに線を引きますか?

知らない人に見られたり、話を聞かれたりすると考えると不快に思いますか?その理由は何ですか?

自分の人生を開いた本だと想像してください。オンラインでのコミュニケーション方法はどう変わるでしょうか?

潜在的な犯罪を防ぐためにあなたの個人的なメッセージが監視されていると知ったらどうしますか?

監視のメリットがプライバシーの権利を上回ると思うのは、いつですか?

国家安全保障のため、あなたの個人的な会話があなたの同意なしに聞かれたらどう思いますか?

自分のプライバシーが侵害されたと感じたことはありますか?もし侵害されている場合、その侵害をどの程度まで制限すればよいでしょうか?

Yes, but only under the scrutiny of the courts where necessary to protect citizens either collectively or individually

No, not at all. I think phone calls and emails should be private. It is not other peoples business and they don't need to know what we are talking about.

Only in severe circumstances where national security is threatened.

They should only be able to monitor people who have been identified as a threat, and only by court order

I say 'no', but only because I see a growing society that has less and less respect for the 'Honour system' and I believe that even though this may be an important tool to protect against suspected crimes of terrorism, it will be abused and misused.

if this was an ironclad method to reduce terrorism, then yes. otherwise, this is an invasion of privacy

I feel like the federal government should be allowed to monitor emails and phone calls that are flagged with key words that insinuate a possible terrorist or illegal act.

I find this to be a ridiculous notion. Under certain circumstances it would be permissible but its a blatant intrusion of privacy and completely unnecessary. A acceptable situation is someone suspected for crimes, but just monitoring people for the sake of doing so is completely illogical.

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, It is the citizens responsibility to protect the country in this case since the government cannot possibly handle everything and proper education provided on the subject in schools on a side note they are taught in a way that does not create future paranoia. Once a threat is flagged by citizens only then should authority intervene. Immigrants will have to be under surveillance for as long their education into citizenship is provided, and Immigrants with a history of violence or fraud will not be allowed into the country.

I'm torn...I am concerned with the federal government having cart blanche access to private information, yet I am for being able to prevent acts that negatively harm groups of innocent people.

Yes but only with a court order or a percieved threat

Yes, after proving that the act is necessary for National security, and combating organized crime and child pornography