@ISIDEWITH質問社会問題4年前

差別的発言は、言論の自由に関する法律によって保護されるべきですか？

差別的発言とは、人種、宗教、性別、性的指向などに基づいて、個人またはグループに対する憎悪を表現したり、暴力を助長したりする公の発言と定義されます。

42%
はい
58%
いいえ
23%
はい
52%
いいえ
11%
はい、暴力を脅かさない限り
3%
いいえ、悪意のある表現に対するペナルティを増やします
8%
はい、私は政府がヘイトスピーチの境界を定義することを信頼していないので
2%
いいえ、言論の自由に関する法律は、政府を批判することから保護するだけです。

過去の結果

10.4kカナダ人有権者における"ヘイトスピーチ”に関する各立場の支持が時間の経過とともにどのように変化したかを確認します。

データを読み込んでいます...

チャートを読み込んでいます... 

歴史的重要性

10.4kカナダ有権者にとって"ヘイトスピーチ”の重要性が時間の経過とともにどのように変化したかをご覧ください。

データを読み込んでいます...

チャートを読み込んでいます... 

最新ニュース

頻繁に更新される最新の"ヘイトスピーチ”に関するニュース記事を常にチェックしてください。

 @ISIDEWITH 提出済み…2週間2W

スコットランドの「ヘイトスピーチ法」が世界的な怒りを巻き起こす

特定のグループに対する憎悪の「煽動」を犯罪とするスコットランドの新法は、国境をはるかに越えた議論を引き起こし、この法律が必要だと主張する人権活動家と、この法律が言論の自由を脅かすと主張する保守派の著名人や政治家に対する嫌がらせや暴力の増加という対立を引き起こしている。先週施行されたスコットランドの法律は、人種、宗教、トランスジェンダーのアイデンティティ、性的指向、年齢、障害を理由に憎悪を煽動することを禁固刑に処する。「そのグループに属していることを理由に憎悪を煽ることが意図されているのであれば、それは刑事犯罪です」と、グラスゴー・カレドニアン大学の法学上級講師ニック・マッケレルは月曜日の電話インタビューで語った。スコットランドでは、検察官が2022〜23年に性的アイデンティティに関連するヘイトクライムの容疑を1,884件記録した。これは8年連続の前年比増加を表し、トランスジェンダーのアイデンティティに関連する容疑は55件あった。人権団体は、この変更はヘイトクライム保護を初めて単一の法律に統合するものであり、待望の拡張だと述べている。ハリー・ポッターの著者J・K・ローリングを含む反対派は、保護が広範すぎるため、表現の自由が不当に犯罪化される可能性があることを懸念していると述べている。（批評家たちは、女性も保護対象に含めるべきだと主張しており、スコットランド政府は別の法律でこれを行うつ…

 @ISIDEWITH 提出済み…3週間3W

ブラジル、イーロン・マスクとの衝突後ソーシャルメディアを規制すると警告

Brazil’s attorney-general has demanded “urgent regulation” of social media sites after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain profiles on his X platform and then called for a Supreme Court justice to “resign or be impeached”.“It is urgent to regulate social networks,” said Jorge Messias.“We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”The comments came after X’s global government affairs team posted that it “has been forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil”. “We do not know the reasons these blocking orders have been issued [and] We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds.”The profiles are probably linked to far-right movements, which have found fertile ground on X and other social media platforms, including Telegram.Musk suggested the court orders came from Alexandre De Moraes, a Supreme Court justice who has been a vocal advocate of cracking down on anti-democratic content online, particularly following riots on January 8 last year when thousands of far-right demonstrators stormed government buildings in Brasília.Musk, the billionaire owner of X, vowed on Sunday to “publish everything demanded by [De Moraes] and how those requests violate Brazilian law”.He called for Moraes to “resign or be impeached” and said the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil”.Musk, a self-declared free speech absolutist, bought X in late 2022 and quickly relaxed its moderation policies and reinstated several previously banned accounts. The moves have been welcomed by some on the right, but critics including civil rights groups have argued the platform is failing to adequately police hate speech and extremist content.Musk’s latest comments echo talking points of Brazil’s far-right, which has long accused De Moraes and the Supreme Court of censorship and running a “judicial dictatorship”.De Moraes is widely considered to have played a role in protecting Brazilian democracy during the 2022 presidential election, when the president at the time Jair Bolsonaro was spreading unsubstantiated claims about the integrity of the electoral system.De Moraes also took a hard line in the aftermath of the Brasília riots, handing down lengthy sentences and accusing the demonstrators of trying to launch a coup.Orlando Silva, a lawmaker aligned with the government, said Musk had disrespected the judiciary and that in response he would propose legislation setting out a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms”.“We have reached a limit. It is a response in defence of Brazil,” he said.The extent of the threat to Brazilian democracy in 2022 was highlighted by a police investigation in February, which has alleged that Bolsonaro, in conjunction with several military officers, considered an armed intervention to prevent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from taking office. Bolsonaro denies the claims.As part of the alleged plot, Bolsonaro had De Moraes put under constant surveillance for weeks following the polls in October 2022, according to federal police.Social media platforms have faced increasing pressure to comply with new laws in countries such as India and Turkey, which can require them to take down content or face bans, fines or the imprisonment of staffers.Critics argue such rules are oppressive and can be abused by country leaders to silence dissidents and activists.Despite regularly espousing free speech ideals, Musk has previously come under fire from critics for appeasing censorship demands from various governments. More recently, however, X has taken to posting publicly about the requests they receive.