Prøv den politiske quiz

0 Svare

 @3FDLGTRfra British Columbia besvart…3 år3Y

No. It would only give the government more money to steal. It.s our money. The government treats us like criminals for wanting it.

 @3FDHK8Ffra Alberta besvart…3 år3Y

Regardless, allow employees the option to opt-out of the CPP and invest in a private pension plan, andallow employees the option to contribute an additional 5%-10%.

 @3FBSH8Dfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

High income earners should contribute more. Low income earners should not have to contribute more—especially if they're barely making a living wage. Percentages are not a fair way to go.

 @3FB8BS5fra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

If there is a concern that funds for CPP is going to run out due to the baby boomers, employees should have the option to contribute additional and employees should also have the option to opt-out and invest in a private pension plan.

 @3F5VDG7fra Quebec besvart…3 år3Y

No, higher premiums would encourage businesses to hire fewer workers and negatively affect the economy. It also reduces the spending money left to the employees.

 @3F34P4Dfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

If any insurance company charged a premium for say 30 years and the client dies prior to collecting any benefits, the the company doesn't pay out at least the amount paid in the said company would be charged with fraud. CPP should be forced to pay the estate at least the amount paid in at a competitive rate of interest.

 @3F22Z4Zfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

Yes higher premiums would help for reinvestments but their has to be controls on making sure companies are not hiring less do to the hike.

 @3DXK6LGfra Saskatchewan besvart…3 år3Y

CPP contributions should never be put into general revenue it should be invested in the in the best way possible for the greatest return on investment and should be done at arms length from the government with no more than twenty percent of the board being government officials

 @3DV6CFTLiberalfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

4.49% of what? Will the employee have enough left over to live on during the season? It is a slippery slope between not-quite enough, especially in seasonal employment areas, and a-little-more-than enough, May just depend on whether you buy tobacco or alcohol.(tax-free or not)

 @LYGQ27fra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

Yes, with a commensurate raise in the minimum wage so lower income earners are not penalized financially.

 @LXQCDGfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

No CPP should be protected from the government so it can not spend the money that belongs to pensioners and not the government.

 @LVYV44fra Nova Scotia besvart…3 år3Y

Keep a default limit set and allow employees to either opt-in to an increase or opt-out into a private plan. Give the employee the choice.

 @LNJVMKfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

No, employers should contribute more via a progressive tax system. Poor people cannot afford to pay more.

 @LN5CCCfra Alberta besvart…3 år3Y

 @LMJHLTfra Manitoba besvart…3 år3Y

 @LLXFYPfra Alberta besvart…3 år3Y

Higher premiums with higher contributions from government and thus better benefits

 @LLQD4Kfra Ontario besvart…3 år3Y

does any thing we pay for go down in price? wake up and tax the rich...throw people who make under 50,000 a rope here.