Try the political quiz

Libertarians policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Libertarians answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but only after they have completed their sentence. This stance emphasizes personal responsibility, the ability to change, and the importance of paying one's debt to society before seeking public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Canadian Libertarian Party generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may agree with allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, as it emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change. However, the party may not fully endorse this view without any conditions or limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with a limitation that the crime was not committed while in office. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about corruption and abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with limitations based on the nature of the crime. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about the suitability of candidates with certain types of criminal convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Canadian Libertarian Party is unlikely to support a blanket ban on politicians with criminal convictions running for office, as it goes against their principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may, however, support some restrictions based on the nature of the crime or other factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime would likely be seen as a violation of the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in the Canadian legal system. The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely disagree with this stance, as it goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,006 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.