+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 35.3k New Democratic voters.

66%
Yes
34%
No
53%
Yes
27%
No
13%
Yes, but only for non-essential services
7%
No, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 35.3k New Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 35.3k New Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from New Democratic voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4D4DL89from Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

No, most government workers are corrupt and lazy. They should be monitored 24/7 and fired if they aren't productive.

 @9D536B2from Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for non-essential services. Essential services should have labour courts to mediate strikes.

 @8PS9XBVfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should stop whining and just work. The work will give them self satisfaction and possible reward. You're the one who needed a job, be grateful.

 @9TNBDV8from British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, and the right to strike should not be infringed or revoked by governments, arbitrators, or anyone else.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but establish a labour court to prevent strikes but if workers want to go through with striking it is fully within their right. it is an act of protest and worker solidarity is something we should protect as that is what brings change to society and can help get rid of a horrible government in times of crisis like we have today.

 @9RTSMX5from Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

They can strike as it is within their freedom rights to do that however, the government should have plans to keep these industries going when they do strike.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only for non-essential services. In addition, there needs to be more requirements to strike because people are striking over the tiniest things.