60%
Yes
40%
No
50%
Yes
30%
No
8%
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
10%
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
1%
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
1%
Yes, and nationalize the industry
1%
Yes, but with public subsidy

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 641k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 641k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @996M5VFfrom Ontario answered…1yr1Y

Yes. The reason being, is that nuclear energy is actually one of the cleanest energy sources on earth. It's just people are afraid to use it due to the Chernobyl incident, when in reality, that was an accident, and not something that would happen when nuclear energy is used.

 @8FZ5VFDfrom Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia answered…3 days3D

Yes, without public subsidy but there should be no public subsidy into ANY industry. Let market forces drive research and innovation. There is much to be done with low yield, low half life reactors. It is possible to have a unit the size of a semi-trailer that powers an entire town. Safe operation should also address safe disposal of spent fuels until fusion energy becomes the preferred choice.

 @9HXHTR4from Ontario answered…3mos3MO

There should be an extensive research into the pros and cons for humain’ health and the environment with nuclear energy

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.