84%
Yes
16%
No
79%
Yes
10%
No
5%
Yes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products
3%
No, but we should adopt a unilateral free trade policy
3%
No, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “NAFTA” has changed over time for 23.5k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “NAFTA” has changed over time for 23.5k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia answered…6 days6D

Yes, as long as citizens of both countries are allowed to travel and work without question. If people are disallowed from freely travelling to and working in the other country then tariffs should be imposed on imported goods from the country that prevents unfettered travel and work. As long as the traveler has no criminal record and would be free to enter the other country as a tourist, they should be able to work there.

 @9JC6BKVfrom Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Trade regulation should probably be decreased, however this allows for massive exploitation so I can't fully endorse it. NAFTA should be a more beneficial policy, however issues with Mexico's enforcement and political structures are preventing the flow of income to Mexico from being effectively implemented in infrastructure and education for Mexican citizens which is maintaining a labour cost imbalance that encourages shipping more jobs to Mexico.

 @9HVHVNQfrom Quebec answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but all updated trade agreements should permit carbon taxes to be applied to imported goods and services.

 @9HDNW7Dfrom Delaware answered…5mos5MO

NAFTA or any trade agreement needs to be reviewed every 2-5 years because situations change. The balance is never truly in place. Amandements need to be enacted to protect the people in all apprticipating countries.

 @9GYSNHDfrom Nova Scotia answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but renegotiate terms to strike a better balance accessing goods not available in the current domestic market while protecting domestic manufacturing.

 @9GPTJ2Dfrom British Columbia answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but renegotiate terms to strike a better balance between accessing goods not available in the current domestic market while protecting domestic manufacturing.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.