37%
Yes
63%
No
29%
Yes
49%
No
4%
Yes, but increase oversight
9%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
4%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
4%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Fracking” has changed over time for 35.4k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Fracking” has changed over time for 35.4k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia answered…6 days6D

Yes, ONLY if all chemicals used in the process can be recovered, stripped out of wastewater and the water used put back to potable conditions. If not, then this again is a market force that will either promote conservation, recovery, alternative fuel sources, methods or importation of fuels from elsewhere.

 @9L7D6G4from Alberta answered…3wks3W

Yes, however it should be done with consideration of various factors such as human population, wild life and other life sustaining resources.

 @9GYSNHDfrom Nova Scotia answered…5mos5MO

No, we should pursue more sustainable resource energy instead and study the long term effects fracking that was already inflicted on the land, particularly in relation to earthquakes.

 @9B3CMGVfrom British Columbia answered…1yr1Y

Combination of both: we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead and studying the long-term effects fracking that was already inflicted on the land, particularly in relation to earthquakes.

 @99PP8NPfrom Nova Scotia answered…1yr1Y

i think it should be used only as necessary, and we should switch to renewable energy soon

 @99GY2ZMfrom Alberta answered…1yr1Y

I don’t know cause I don’t know what hydraulic freckling even is

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.