At the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 178 countries voted to adopt Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is non-binding action plan that sets climate sustainability and poverty. guidelines for national, state and local governments. Proponents argue that the agenda’s guidelines will encourage federal and local governments to protect the environment and combat poverty. Opponents argue that global organizations should not make rules for local governments and these rules are unnecessary because they are impossible to enforce.
76% Yes |
24% No |
72% Yes |
19% No |
4% Yes, and exceed the guidelines and be the world leader in environmental standards |
4% No, come up with local solutions that work for each community |
1% No, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead |
|
1% No, and the UN should be abolished |
See how support for each position on “Local Environmental Guidelines” has changed over time for 28.6k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Local Environmental Guidelines” has changed over time for 28.6k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9K6HR9K2mos2MO
No, this only subdues us and makes us only look more controlled to the weak jewish mindsetted and bankerist dogs while their cabinets reeks of dumb communistic idealized pigs who have nothing in common with anyone, total demolition is what we need for the headquarters and such as mass death.
@95K5YQG2yrs2Y
They should be a guideline, but they should figure out solutions that work for each community rather than adhering to one way.
@945C4M22yrs2Y
Yes, but they should make up community solutions that work.
@93RPYDT2yrs2Y
It vareys based on what the guidlines are
@8QXR4423yrs3Y
Yes as long as the guidelines are reasonable
@8QX2HL83yrs3Y
Yes, except I don't want us to be apart of the UN
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.