@ISIDEWITHOtázkyDomáce politikapred 13 rokmi

Mala by existovať ďalšie obmedzenia týkajúce sa súčasného procesu nákupu zbraň?

V roku 2012 Sandy Hook Základná škola streľby spôsobil niekoľko štátov a miest sa potom prísne kontrolné pištole opatrenia. V odozve, štátna zákonodarcovia v konzervačným priateľských štátov na juhu a západe prešiel účty, ktoré by posilnili stoja vaša krajina zákony a umožniť zbraní na väčšine verejných miestach. V roku 2014, 21 uvádza, prešiel zákony, ktoré rozšírili pr&aa…  

Čítaj viac
+
zväčšiť
+ nastavenie x  komunizmus

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Ovládanie Gun

@9VWM59X
#1 Engaged Voter
@9ZPX698
#2 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Prehľad Odpovedí

Miera odpovedí od 546 komunizmus voličov.

65%
Áno,
35%
Žiadny
47%
Áno,
28%
Žiadny
11%
Áno, vyžadovať prísne kontroly na pozadí, psychologické testovanie a školenie
3%
Nie, len pre zločincov a duševne chorých
5%
Áno, a zakázať všetky zbrane z verejnej využitia
2%
Nie, ale zvýšiť sankcie za trestné činy súvisiace s pištoľou
1%
Áno, ale iba zatvorením Gun Show medzeru
1%
Nie, vláda by mala prejsť národné "stojí vaša krajina" zákon
1%
Nie, len pre útočných zbraní

Historická Podpora

Trend podpory v priebehu času pre každú odpoveď od 546 komunizmus voličov.

Loading data...

Načítava sa graf... 

Historický Význam

Trend, aký dôležitý je tento problém pre 546 komunizmus voličov.

Loading data...

Načítava sa graf... 

Ďalšie Populárne Odpovede

Jedinečné odpovede komunizmus voličov, ktorých názory presahovali poskytnuté možnosti.

Najnovšie Správy

Zostaňte informovaní o najnovších článkoch „Ovládanie zbraní” , ktoré sú často aktualizované.

 @ISIDEWITH predložené…7mos7MO

Trump Takes Center Stage at NRA Rally with Bold Promises and Controversial Remarks

At the recent National Rifle Association (NRA) rally in Dallas, former President Donald Trump captured the spotlight with a series of bold promises and controversial remarks that have ignited discussions across the political spectrum. Trump pledged to 'roll back' gun control measures introduced by President Joe Biden and vowed to fire the chief of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) if he returns to office. His speech, while light on new policy details, was heavy on criticism of the current administration's approach to gun laws, positioning himself as a staunch defender of the Second Amendment in the lead-up to the November election.However, Trump's appearance at the NRA event was not without its controversies. A momentary 'freeze' during his speech, lasting over 30 seconds, sparked a flurry of speculation on social media about the former president's health, with some suggesting it was a 'senile brain glitch.' This incident has added fuel to the ongoing debate about the fitness of political leaders for office, particularly among older candidates.Adding to the contentious atmosphere, Trump's verbal attack on President Biden, in which he labeled him as having a 'low IQ,' has been criticized as 'delusional' by some commentators. This personal attack, made during a speech that was supposed to focus on gun rights, has been seen as a diversion from substantive policy discussion, highlighting the increasingly polarized nature of American politics.The NRA rally has thus become a microcosm of the broader political landscape in the United States, with Trump's performance encapsulating the challenges of navigating a deeply divided electorate. His ability to command attention and stir controversy remains undiminished, suggesting that he will continue to be a pivotal figure in American politics as the election season heats up.As the country moves closer to the November elections, the events at the NRA rally underscore the high stakes involved in the debate over gun control, the health and capability of political leaders, and the tone of political discourse. With Trump's remarks and the reactions they have provoked, the stage is set for a contentious run-up to the election, with implications for both domestic policy and the international image of American democracy.