Спробуйте політичну вікторину

0 Відповісти

 @3FDLGTRз British Columbia відповів…3 роки3Y

 @3FDHK8Fз Alberta відповів…3 роки3Y

 @3FBSH8Dз Ontario відповів…3 роки3Y

High income earners should contribute more. Low income earners should not have to contribute more—especially if they're barely making a living wage. Percentages are not a fair way to go.

 @3FB8BS5з Ontario відповів…3 роки3Y

If there is a concern that funds for CPP is going to run out due to the baby boomers, employees should have the option to contribute additional and employees should also have the option to opt-out and invest in a private pension plan.

 @3F5VDG7з Quebec відповів…3 роки3Y

 @3F34P4Dз Ontario відповів…3 роки3Y

If any insurance company charged a premium for say 30 years and the client dies prior to collecting any benefits, the the company doesn't pay out at least the amount paid in the said company would be charged with fraud. CPP should be forced to pay the estate at least the amount paid in at a competitive rate of interest.

 @3F22Z4Zз Ontario відповів…3 роки3Y

 @3DXK6LGз Saskatchewan відповів…3 роки3Y

CPP contributions should never be put into general revenue it should be invested in the in the best way possible for the greatest return on investment and should be done at arms length from the government with no more than twenty percent of the board being government officials

 @3DV6CFTЛіберальназ Ontario відповів…3 роки3Y

4.49% of what? Will the employee have enough left over to live on during the season? It is a slippery slope between not-quite enough, especially in seasonal employment areas, and a-little-more-than enough, May just depend on whether you buy tobacco or alcohol.(tax-free or not)

 @LVYV44з Nova Scotia відповів…3 роки3Y