Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
80% Yes |
20% No |
69% Yes |
15% No |
8% Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
2% No, I would prefer term limits instead |
3% Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office |
1% No, this discriminates against older politicians |
1% No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
|
1% No, our government needs experienced leaders |
See how support for each position on “Mental competency testing” has changed over time for 1.4k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Mental competency testing” has changed over time for 1.4k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9JWWFBK2mos2MO
Mandatory retirement should be initiated at 75, along with Term Limits for all elected roles, and the senate should be banned or elected.
@9FMDLYL7mos7MO
Nobody above age 70 should be able to run
@9FF5G767mos7MO
Just cap the age at 70 instead
@99MWZYP1yr1Y
No, but those older than 75 shouldn't be able to run
@9D3WWDS9mos9MO
No, there should be an age limit of 70 for running for public office.
@9D36K4Q9mos9MO
It depends. There's a legitimate argument to be made, as older people have more health issues which could impede decisions, but younger people also have that to some ability, so I would say we should be more cautious.
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.
