Le gouvernement devrait-il augmenter les réglementations environnementales sur les entreprises pour réduire les émissions de carbone?

La taxe carbone est la plus grande fraude canadienne connu a présent.

Nous devrions proposer une décroissance économique

Il faut améliorer les techniques d'usinage.

Augmenter les réglementations pour les multinationales et diminuer pour les pme

ce dépende sur le zone dans quel l'entreprise existe.

J'ai 13 ans

La fabrication de Batteries pour les voitures électriques est toute aussi nocive pour l'environnment. LA Solution et l'arrêt d'utilisation de véhicule personnel dans les grandes villes ( taxez ça ) FORCER les gens à prendre le transport en commun. Rendez le accessible .

Oui, mais pas les petite enterprise ou les enterprise locale

Oui, car le sacrifice est nécessaire pour l'avenir de l'espèce humaine, mais en même temps il faut que tout les pays de l'ONU y participe. Il faut avoir des plans de reforestation pour filtrer le CO2.

Oui mais ces plus compliqué que sa je le sais. On peut pas empêcher une entreprise de ne pas pollué ou de réduire as pollution ces chiffres d'Affaire seront moins bon. Les entreprises font parti du problème mais les gens aussi devrait se responsabilisé et avoir de bonne pratique de consomations. Ces sûr on serais 1 milliard sur la planète sa serait moins compliqué écologiquement parlant.

oui, mais pas de gros changement et c'est pas la priorité

No, but instead focus on using what we have instead of choking it out fully. Like the hybrid fuel that is being developed is fully carbon neutral

Non, il faudrait complétement nucléariser l'énergie pour lutter contre le réchauffement climatique et aussi taxé les multinationales et les entreprises polluantes

Quelles valeurs personnelles guident vos opinions sur le rôle du gouvernement dans la réglementation des pratiques commerciales pour lutter contre le changement climatique ?

Si un employeur local important polluait l’air ou l’eau de votre région, comment vous attendriez-vous à ce que le gouvernement réagisse ?

Comment percevez-vous l’équilibre entre création d’emplois et protection de l’environnement dans le contexte de réglementations plus strictes en matière d’émissions ?

Quels sacrifices seriez-vous prêt à faire dans votre style de vie pour garantir un environnement plus propre aux générations futures ?

Pouvez-vous penser à une époque où l’intervention gouvernementale a conduit à un résultat positif pour la société, semblable à la façon dont une réglementation accrue pourrait aider l’environnement ?

Si vos produits préférés devenaient plus chers en raison des lois environnementales, comment cela affecterait-il vos habitudes d’achat ?

De quelle manière pensez-vous que les propriétaires de petites entreprises devraient s’adapter aux nouvelles réglementations environnementales destinées à réduire les émissions ?

Imaginez un avenir avec de l’air et de l’eau purs ; Comment des politiques environnementales plus strictes aujourd’hui pourraient-elles contribuer à concrétiser cette vision ?

Avez-vous déjà ressenti les effets de la pollution dans votre propre communauté, et comment des réglementations plus strictes pourraient-elles empêcher cela ?

Comment votre quotidien changerait-il si les entreprises avaient des règles plus strictes pour lutter contre le changement climatique ?

dont have an opinion.

If Ontario can show an economic future for Solar then I would listen to a "Business Plan". I may consider it a viable investment if it can be proven. I have no interest in subsidizing power we sell to the USA

The problem is that the government only cares about what looks on paper.
Yes it sounds good to say, "if we increase an imaginary environment tax, businesses will change" but that isn't the case in reality. The change needs to come from the top and needs to be given to the businesses whom in return, give it to the people... You don't truly care about the environment anyway with all your faith in Monsanto, how does one trust your decisions?

Where it makes sense both economically and comparatively to other industries such as coal and other countries regulations.

Mandate energy companies putting a moderate percentage of profits into renewable energy sources.

In some instances there should be greater environmental protection - oil sands. There should be incentives for self regulation, environmental protection actions taken by firms and for alternative energy.

Provide incentive but do not force it on businesses because it effects everyone. New businesses should have a requirement for alternative energies on startup and should get a kickback if they do decide on it and since they do not need to pay as much for running costs, they should lower their prices to their consumers or put money back towards their business under a five year term depending on the type of business (If they deal with consumers directly or not). The ones that do not decide to change have a limit of 5 years to get the funds for alternative energies or face closure. Small busines…  Lire la suiteses are granted grandfather clause, all other old existing establishments have 5 to ten years to change to alternative energies or face being stripped down into a small business. Taxing businesses only prolongs the issue so going about it another way may resolve the issue.

Increase regulation on large polluting companies and provide incentives for renewable energy but still supporting oil and gas

Yes but not so much in regards to prevention of climate change, which I believe is a natural occurrence, how ever the environmental regulations should be in place to ensure that we do not poison the land, water and air for our children, grand children and their children.

Rigorously enforce the regulations we already have. Ensure the same rules apply to Canadian companies and stakeholders including companies that makes contracts with Canadian companies when they are outside of Canada.

We have enough legislation. What we need is enforcement!

Increase regulations increases chances of companies leaving the country. Invest more into nuclear energy and greenhouse gases will decrease significantly

No, The government is our biggest polluter, it's hypocritical and more of a do as I say, not as I do. The private sector should be incentivized to pursue these solutions themselves

No, I feel we have no responsibility to the earth or future generations and we are entitled to use the world in whichever way we see fit. This enables our quality of life to increase whilst maintaining a more realistic view of the human condition as one that is temporary and should be enjoyed as much as possible for its duration.

The federal government needs to enact fair, negotiated regulations and enforce them with integrity and sufficient funding. I suggest taxation to businesses should be based on how much oversight they need.

Carbon Tax!

Environmental protection through government regulation is necessary. However this doesn't mean an increase in regulation - it could mean a more careful application of current regulation or even deregulation. It ain't an easy answer guys.

On one hand, we should be trying to keep the Earth clean and healthy. On the other hand, most of us will be dead before it affects us.

We don't need more we need better.

There should be regulations to benefit the environment (i.e. Singapore's buying out on cars >10y.o) that can be helpful to the environment in the long wrong however they are not too straining on the lifestyles we are accustomed to living

Complete moratorium on all non-renewable natural resources in Canada until such time as sovereignty is regained in the banking system and the CAD is at parity with the USD. Moratorium on dumping toxic waste anywhere in Canada as well as its export until a proven non-polluting disposal method is found and approved.

Yes. The government is the Public's watchdog. Environmental regulations are crucial to the safety of our world. However, this does not mean that the government should look for funds to do this. It should be their mandate on behalf of the citizens of the country. There is no room for the ability for corporations to bribe government officials.

The federal governments in all developed countries should adopt a carbon credit card for all individuals and businesses based upon a head count and revenue respectively. Each carbon based transaction (like your airmiles card) gets recorded in a declining balance. Those who don't use (typically the less financially secure) can sell their credits in an open market. Each year the available credits drop by 3%.

place environmental regulations only on businesses that are known to cause higher levels of impact on the environment

We should be similar to US, if not we drive business out if the country and we'll lose jobs.

Government regulation under capitalism isn't possible.