अमेरिका में एक नागरिक एक संघीय उम्मीदवार को चुनाव के प्रति $ 2,700, किसी राज्य या स्थानीय पार्टी समिति के लिए पीएसी को प्रति वर्ष $ 5000, $ 10,000 प्रति वर्ष और एक राष्ट्रीय पार्टी के लिए प्रति वर्ष $ 33.400 दे सकता है। नागरिक और निगमों के एक सुपर पीएसी को असीमित मात्रा में दे सकता है। एक सुपर पीएसी के रूप में लंबे समय से यह एक उम्मीदवार या अभियान निधि नहीं है के रूप में या एक अभियान कैसे दान खर्च करने के साथ सीधे समन्वय के परंपरागत अभियान वित्त कानूनों से मुक्त कर दिया है।
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
How do you feel about the idea that some people or groups can donate much larger sums to influence elections than others?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
Do you think money plays too large a role in deciding which political candidates get the most attention?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
Should there be limits on how much any person or corporation can spend on influencing society through elections?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
How might campaign spending affect the trust people have in the political system?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
Do you feel like political donations reflect democratic values, or do they give some people more influence than others?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
To what extent do you think money can change the outcome of an election in ways that votes alone wouldn’t?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
How might campaign finance laws impact whether everyday people feel their voices are being heard in politics?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
Should there be stricter rules on who can donate to political campaigns, or should contributions be seen as free speech?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
How important do you think transparency is in campaign donations—should the public know who is giving money to support or oppose a candidate?
@ISIDEWITH3MOS3MO
What impact do you think unlimited donations to political groups (Super PACs) have on debates about important societal issues?
