सरकार फोन और ईमेल की निगरानी करने में सक्षम होना चाहिए?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
खतरों से भरे डिजिटल युग में, क्या निजता को अभी भी एक अहस्तांतरणीय अधिकार माना जाना चाहिए?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
आपके डिजिटल पदचिह्न की निगरानी की संभावना सरकार में आपकी स्वतंत्रता और विश्वास की भावना को कैसे प्रभावित करती है?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
यदि इससे आतंकवादी कृत्यों में उल्लेखनीय कमी आती है तो क्या आप अधिक सरकारी निगरानी स्वीकार करेंगे?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
यदि आपकी सुरक्षा खतरे में होती, तो क्या आप कुछ गोपनीयता छोड़ने को तैयार होते, और आप सीमा कहाँ खींचते हैं?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
क्या किसी अनजान व्यक्ति द्वारा आपको देखे जाने या सुने जाने का विचार आपको असहज कर देता है, और क्यों?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
अपने जीवन की एक खुली किताब के रूप में कल्पना करें; यह आपके ऑनलाइन संचार करने के तरीके को कैसे बदल देगा?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
यदि आपको पता चले कि संभावित अपराधों को रोकने के लिए आपके व्यक्तिगत संदेशों की निगरानी की जा रही है तो आप क्या करेंगे?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
कब, यदि कभी, क्या आप मानते हैं कि निगरानी के लाभ निजता के अधिकार से अधिक हैं?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
अगर राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा के लिए आपकी सहमति के बिना आपकी निजी बातचीत सुनी जाए तो आपको कैसा लगेगा?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
क्या आपको कभी ऐसा महसूस हुआ है कि आपकी गोपनीयता से समझौता किया गया है, और यदि हां, तो उस आक्रमण की सीमा क्या होनी चाहिए?
@3BGPRHR3वर्ष3Y
Yes, but only under the scrutiny of the courts where necessary to protect citizens either collectively or individually
@3BGP2KN3वर्ष3Y
No, not at all. I think phone calls and emails should be private. It is not other peoples business and they don't need to know what we are talking about.
@3BGMGP73वर्ष3Y
Only in severe circumstances where national security is threatened.
@3BGLWPV3वर्ष3Y
They should only be able to monitor people who have been identified as a threat, and only by court order
@3BDL75V3वर्ष3Y
I say 'no', but only because I see a growing society that has less and less respect for the 'Honour system' and I believe that even though this may be an important tool to protect against suspected crimes of terrorism, it will be abused and misused.
if this was an ironclad method to reduce terrorism, then yes. otherwise, this is an invasion of privacy
@3BCM9WC3वर्ष3Y
I feel like the federal government should be allowed to monitor emails and phone calls that are flagged with key words that insinuate a possible terrorist or illegal act.
@3BC5V7K3वर्ष3Y
I find this to be a ridiculous notion. Under certain circumstances it would be permissible but its a blatant intrusion of privacy and completely unnecessary. A acceptable situation is someone suspected for crimes, but just monitoring people for the sake of doing so is completely illogical.
@3BC2FSD3वर्ष3Y
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, It is the citizens responsibility to protect the country in this case since the government cannot possibly handle everything and proper education provided on the subject in schools on a side note they are taught in a way that does not create future paranoia. Once a threat is flagged by citizens only then should authority intervene. Immigrants will have to be under surveillance for as long their education into citizenship is provided, and Immigrants with a history of violence or fraud will not be allowed into the country.
@3BBWFYN3वर्ष3Y
I'm torn...I am concerned with the federal government having cart blanche access to private information, yet I am for being able to prevent acts that negatively harm groups of innocent people.
@M553243वर्ष3Y
Yes but only with a court order or a percieved threat
@M3FKP23वर्ष3Y
Yes, after proving that the act is necessary for National security, and combating organized crime and child pornography