राजनीतिक प्रश्नोत्तरी प्रयास करें

0 जवाब दे दो

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

जलवायु परिवर्तन से निपटने के लिए व्यावसायिक प्रथाओं को विनियमित करने में सरकार की भूमिका पर आपकी राय को कौन से व्यक्तिगत मूल्य निर्देशित करते हैं?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

यदि कोई प्रमुख स्थानीय नियोक्ता आपके क्षेत्र की हवा या पानी को प्रदूषित कर रहा है, तो आप सरकार से कैसे प्रतिक्रिया की उम्मीद करेंगे?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

सख्त उत्सर्जन नियमों के संदर्भ में आप रोजगार सृजन और पर्यावरण संरक्षण के बीच संतुलन को कैसे देखते हैं?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

भावी पीढ़ियों के लिए स्वच्छ वातावरण सुनिश्चित करने के लिए आप अपनी जीवनशैली में क्या त्याग करना चाहेंगे?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

क्या आप ऐसे समय के बारे में सोच सकते हैं जब सरकारी हस्तक्षेप से समाज के लिए सकारात्मक परिणाम निकले, जैसे कि बढ़े हुए नियमों से पर्यावरण को कैसे मदद मिल सकती है?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

यदि आपके पसंदीदा उत्पाद पर्यावरण कानूनों के कारण अधिक महंगे हो गए हैं, तो इसका आपकी खरीदारी की आदतों पर क्या प्रभाव पड़ेगा?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

आपको क्या लगता है कि छोटे व्यवसाय मालिकों को उत्सर्जन कम करने के उद्देश्य से नए पर्यावरणीय नियमों को किस प्रकार अपनाना चाहिए?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

स्वच्छ हवा और पानी वाले भविष्य की कल्पना करें; आज सख्त पर्यावरण नीतियां उस दृष्टिकोण को साकार करने में कैसे मदद कर सकती हैं?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

क्या आपने कभी अपने समुदाय में प्रदूषण के प्रभावों को महसूस किया है, और मजबूत नियम इसे कैसे रोक सकते हैं?

 @ISIDEWITHयह पूछने पर…5mos5MO

यदि जलवायु परिवर्तन से निपटने के लिए व्यवसायों के पास सख्त नियम हों तो आपका दैनिक जीवन कैसे बदल जाएगा?

 @3BH4Q4KAlberta से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

If Ontario can show an economic future for Solar then I would listen to a "Business Plan". I may consider it a viable investment if it can be proven. I have no interest in subsidizing power we sell to the USA

 @3BDWDFBरूढ़िवादीOntario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

The problem is that the government only cares about what looks on paper.
Yes it sounds good to say, "if we increase an imaginary environment tax, businesses will change" but that isn't the case in reality. The change needs to come from the top and needs to be given to the businesses whom in return, give it to the people... You don't truly care about the environment anyway with all your faith in Monsanto, how does one trust your decisions?

 @3BCZWSYNova Scotia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

 @3BC2FSDOntario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Provide incentive but do not force it on businesses because it effects everyone. New businesses should have a requirement for alternative energies on startup and should get a kickback if they do decide on it and since they do not need to pay as much for running costs, they should lower their prices to their consumers or put money back towards their business under a five year term depending on the type of business (If they deal with consumers directly or not). The ones that do not decide to change have a limit of 5 years to get the funds for alternative energies or face closure. Small busines…  अधिक पढ़ें

 @3B94P7YBritish Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Yes but not so much in regards to prevention of climate change, which I believe is a natural occurrence, how ever the environmental regulations should be in place to ensure that we do not poison the land, water and air for our children, grand children and their children.

 @3B87WQHAlberta से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Rigorously enforce the regulations we already have. Ensure the same rules apply to Canadian companies and stakeholders including companies that makes contracts with Canadian companies when they are outside of Canada.

 @35FHLX7Alberta से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

 @35CCP8SNova Scotia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

No, I feel we have no responsibility to the earth or future generations and we are entitled to use the world in whichever way we see fit. This enables our quality of life to increase whilst maintaining a more realistic view of the human condition as one that is temporary and should be enjoyed as much as possible for its duration.

 @35C4SG5British Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

The federal government needs to enact fair, negotiated regulations and enforce them with integrity and sufficient funding. I suggest taxation to businesses should be based on how much oversight they need.

 @35BV8SXOntario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Environmental protection through government regulation is necessary. However this doesn't mean an increase in regulation - it could mean a more careful application of current regulation or even deregulation. It ain't an easy answer guys.

 @34XQXCSSaskatchewan से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

There should be regulations to benefit the environment (i.e. Singapore's buying out on cars >10y.o) that can be helpful to the environment in the long wrong however they are not too straining on the lifestyles we are accustomed to living

 @34XJKJDBritish Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Complete moratorium on all non-renewable natural resources in Canada until such time as sovereignty is regained in the banking system and the CAD is at parity with the USD. Moratorium on dumping toxic waste anywhere in Canada as well as its export until a proven non-polluting disposal method is found and approved.

 @34V2Q88Quebec से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Yes. The government is the Public's watchdog. Environmental regulations are crucial to the safety of our world. However, this does not mean that the government should look for funds to do this. It should be their mandate on behalf of the citizens of the country. There is no room for the ability for corporations to bribe government officials.

 @34QC7HPBritish Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

The federal governments in all developed countries should adopt a carbon credit card for all individuals and businesses based upon a head count and revenue respectively. Each carbon based transaction (like your airmiles card) gets recorded in a declining balance. Those who don't use (typically the less financially secure) can sell their credits in an open market. Each year the available credits drop by 3%.

 @34HTVNVOntario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

The government should pursue such a mandate in a way that does not discourage economic growth and plague local and weaker businesses that may or may not have as large as an impact on the environment as larger and more intrusive companies. Thus the increase on environmental regulations should be on a case by case basis, according to the valued opinions of professionals within the country (and maybe even abroad). Incentives could be given, but not in a way that makes the government seem as if it is unable to take a hard line. There is certainly a fine line to be walked here.

 @34D6N5TAlberta से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

 @344LFNCBritish Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

As a physicist, I don't believe that global warming is caused by the green house gas effect but by the production of heat by all processes. Therefore, using alternative energies is actually less efficient as they produce more heat and have other environmental issues involved with their use, many of which are never spoken about in the mainstream media. The best method would be to cut back on all energy consumption.

 @33ZQ7WKOntario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

With the unequal response Globally, what's the point? It's just a money grab with very little effect. Unless it's forced on China and other major polluters, it just puts us at a disadvantage in Global trading. We need employment in this country and forcing new taxes and costs on Corporations won't help!

 @33ZN699Ontario से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

I believe global warming is a natural occurrence, but I also believe that we should be good stewards to the earth and take care of it, so incentives should be provided for companies who use alternative energy sources.

 @33STNYTBritish Columbia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

Why focus on businesses? Economic incentives that effect all persons are key, and among them should be rewards for environmental innovations and r&d money for the greening of the economy. Government has to manage these issues. There is no other power to check the greed and laziness that business and citizen alike are prone to.

 @33769RHNova Scotia से उत्तर…3वर्ष3Y

push for a global standard so that every country is on a level playing field. imposing regulations on Canada only will make it less competitive in many business sectors compared to other countries without these standards that have lower costs as a result.