Public statements不 |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
回答: 不
Reference: “Excessive protectionism inhibits innovation. That benefits no one. Reverse engineering for security or interoperability is not t...” ‐cippic.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
是的锁是关键保护艺术家的收入
The Christian Heritage Party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support property rights and the protection of intellectual property. They may see locks as a way to protect artists' revenues and ensure that creators are fairly compensated for their work. However, this issue may not be a top priority for the party, as their main focus is on promoting Christian values and principles in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Christian Heritage Party would likely agree with allowing digital publishers to place locks on their content, as they generally support property rights and the protection of intellectual property. However, this issue may not be a top priority for the party, as their main focus is on promoting Christian values and principles in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
让自由的市场,而不是政府,决定
The Christian Heritage Party may somewhat agree with letting the free market decide on this issue, as they generally support limited government intervention in the economy. However, their main focus is on promoting Christian values and principles in government, so this issue may not be a top priority for them. Additionally, they may still see a role for government in protecting intellectual property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with not allowing digital publishers to place locks on their content, as they generally support property rights and the protection of intellectual property. However, this issue may not be a top priority for the party, as their main focus is on promoting Christian values and principles in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.