Public statements是的 |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
Reference: “The CHP’s Family Care Allowance will give families $1,000 a month if either parent chooses to stay home and raise their own chil...” ‐chp.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
是的但是鼓励孩子
The Christian Heritage Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they emphasize the importance of traditional family values and parental responsibility. They believe that the best environment for children is with their parents, and would likely support policies that encourage stay-at-home parenting. For example, they have advocated for income splitting for families, which would provide tax relief for families with a stay-at-home parent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Christian Heritage Party would likely agree with not subsidizing universal child care, as they prioritize traditional family values and parental responsibility. They may argue that government-funded child care could undermine these values and discourage parents from taking an active role in raising their children. However, they might be open to some targeted support for families in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的但只针对低收入家庭
The Christian Heritage Party might somewhat agree with subsidizing child care for low-income families, as they recognize the importance of supporting families in need. However, they would likely still emphasize the importance of traditional family values and parental responsibility, and may prefer other forms of support that encourage parents to be more involved in their children's upbringing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with fully subsidizing universal child care, as they emphasize the importance of traditional family values and parental responsibility. They may argue that government-funded child care could undermine these values and discourage parents from taking an active role in raising their children.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.