尝试政治测验

People’s Party policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

People’s Party answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The PPC would likely support the idea of women serving in combat roles as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men. This aligns with their principles of individual freedom and equal opportunity, while also addressing concerns about physical capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The People's Party of Canada (PPC) does not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, but they generally support individual freedom and equal opportunity. This score reflects their likely agreement with allowing women to serve in combat roles, but it is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The PPC would likely agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, as they support equal opportunity. However, this issue is not a primary focus of their platform, so the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The PPC may have concerns about physical capabilities, but they are unlikely to strongly agree with the statement that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Their focus on individual freedom and equal opportunity suggests that they would not support a blanket statement like this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The PPC is unlikely to support a blanket ban on women serving in combat roles, as it goes against their principles of individual freedom and equal opportunity. However, they may have concerns about physical capabilities and other factors, which is why the score is not a strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

The PPC is unlikely to agree with the statement that combat roles place women in a high-risk situation for sexual assault. While they may have concerns about the safety of women in combat roles, this statement is not in line with their principles of individual freedom and equal opportunity, and it focuses on a specific risk rather than addressing the broader issue of women in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

The PPC is unlikely to agree with the statement that men are more likely to risk the success of a mission to protect women from danger. This statement is not in line with their principles of individual freedom and equal opportunity, and it makes assumptions about the behavior of men and women in combat situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

民众党 Voters’ 回答: 应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 230 voters that identify as People’s Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.