Try the political quiz

680 Replies

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

@93BR42HPeople’s Partyfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos

@93B6FPPfrom Ontario  answered…6mos

Internet should be open and not controlled by only two overseers (bell and rogers)

@92YHQCV from California answered…7mos

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

@92C6BJVfrom Ontario  answered…8mos

@88NZKDZ from New York answered…11mos

No, and we shouldn't have private internet service providers. This industry should be syndicated and available for free for everyone.

@8Y2PBJR from Minnesota answered…12mos

NO, DO PEOPLE DO THIS? that is so freaking stupid. THAT'S WHY M MOBILE DATA SUCKS!!!

@8XZNFFCfrom British Columbia  answered…12mos

Yes, I don't agree with this practice but the government should not regulate businesses.

@8X2LCJJfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr

@8W949N6 from Kansas answered…1yr

The internet should be open and free, but private companies have the right to speed up access to websites that pay more for advertising.

@8VWXDZSfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr

@8VW3BPWfrom Alberta  answered…1yr

yes but this must be divulged so consumers can choose between this type of provider and a unbiased type provider

@8VVG3K4from Ontario  answered…1yr

No, the internet should be controlled by the state and should be free and accessible to everyone

@8VP958Sfrom Ontario  answered…1yr

No. Why should the internet provider decide what is most important for each individual paying customer?

@8VH2TZWConservativefrom Quebec  answered…1yr

No, this isn't fair market compétition and providers should be sanctioned for this practice

 @EdmundSnow98 answered…1yr

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. ISPs need to treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet.

@8TWBDL7from Ontario  answered…1yr

@8LJSX8D from Texas answered…1yr

@8SXSTLG from Oregon answered…2yrs

@8RZTDGCGreenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs

@IINXMP from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs

@IINXMP from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs

Yes, but we should support the openess and freedom of the internet, as well as support companies like Stacks, who give the user power over their own data.

@8R52NV8from New Brunswick  answered…2yrs

 @8P6PWZP from Louisiana answered…2yrs

@8P5LGN6from Ontario  answered…2yrs

@89GKS95 from Florida answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if the infrastructure is opened up for all companies to use.

@8P3F3JTfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs

@eleemoore from Kentucky answered…2yrs

@6PJZCMJ from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs

@8KLHHQYfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs

Yes, we should make internet free of charge and socialize access.

@8J7VYJT from Arizona answered…2yrs

No, quality of service should be determined by the internet plan of the destination address, not the source.

  Deleted answered…2yrs

If the ISP charges fixed rates for fixed levels of service, that would be acceptable. If the ISP actually degrades the service of one user to increase that of another, that is unacceptable.

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

@ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...