Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @6TJYHPDLiberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

No, and pass strict laws prohibiting any government surveillance of private citizens who do not receive any type of welfare, benefits or aid from the government

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause.

 @8ZYQ39C from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, I support it but the government should have limited powers and they should be reasonable when it comes to suspecting terrorists.

 @5BMX4XTanswered…2yrs2Y

No and Felony charges must be brought against any Gov't employee who fabricates evidence in order to surveil citizens

 @8YJ6ZGY from Michigan answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the authorization of indefinite detention without trial for immigrants should be removed.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to those who have ties to terrorist groups, and make more specific the list of activities that qualify for terrorism charges with sufficient evidence and a warrant for legal and necessary reasons, and require due process as well.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government should collect knowledge for security, but only to those who have ties to terrorist groups, and make more specific the list of activities that qualify for terrorism charges with sufficient evidence and a warrant for legal and necessary reasons, and require due process as well.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but limit the scope of the government’s powers

Yes, but only to those who have ties to terrorist groups with sufficient evidence and a warrant for legal and necessary reasons, as well as limit the scope of the government’s powers in order to prevent the trampling of the 4th amendment.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to those who have ties to terrorist groups with sufficient evidence and a warrant for legal and necessary reasons in order to prevent the trampling of the 4th amendment.

 @8XNTMK7 from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but people should not be deported just because they are suspected of a crime.

 @8XHP223 from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

 @8W949N6 from Kansas answered…3yrs3Y

We do not need to live in a fear-based society. We don't need to surveillance our allies or citizens. If someone is a suspected terrorist then they should be watched, but there needs to be real evidence showing this.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes. the government should be able to survey at basic levels, but only in depth when they have sufficient evidence and a warrant.

 @8V3ZWY5 from Illinois answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but we should be more careful with who we throw out, not just everyone that comes in. This means that we should make sure they are bad before we throw them out.

 @8TP6QKSanswered…3yrs3Y

No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance under any circumstances whatsoever

 @8TKFNNS from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

No we need to Pass a new law Known as The American Protection Act that is for the people and not for the government.

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…3yrs3Y

As with most issues, he will avoid specifically saying yes or no. He will only hint one way or the other when it suits his narrative.

 @8SXXRWN from Oregon answered…3yrs3Y

 @OofPoof681 from Tennessee answered…3yrs3Y

 @8PXJBZS from Georgia answered…3yrs3Y

No - The Patriot Act should be immediately and fully repealed - there is no place for secret courts in the USA.

  @8P6PWZP from Louisiana answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NXSCW2 from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only on suspected terrorist with very strict probably causes

 @8H4DF7B from Arizona answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but limit the scope of government power and require a warrant to access information.

 @8LFX8XH from New York answered…3yrs3Y

 @8MF2HYV from Maine answered…3yrs3Y

No, but I am for some surveillance (as in the UK), so long as it is not coupled with criminalization without due process (as in Guantanamo) and I believe the categories are too broad.

 @8LSQMBQ from Indiana answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if it is proven that the person has done something and only in the United States

  @7Z9CD7K from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

No, the Patriot act has been on of the most egregious assaults on the Bill of Rights since its inception.

 @8C4Q7JD from Minnesota answered…4yrs4Y