Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9CBTBW3from Alberta answered…10mos10MO

Yes, subsidize the installation of local/individual solar/wind apparatus to reduce the dependance on current methods and pass the savings on to home owners/renters who participate.

 @9KBWSK8from Saskatchewan answered…1mo1MO

No, the government doesn’t have the understanding required to assess the impacts of “renewables”. It will also make the industry reliant on subsidies

 @9KBFTYW from British Columbia answered…1mo1MO

No, if the companies are private they should be allowed to succumb to the same economic factors that influence the rest of the economy. Energy production for individual consumers should be low cost for citizens since it is produced with our country's resources. Buildings for corporations should be required to produce or contribute to the production of energy through environmentally sustainable means.

 @9JST8CMConservativefrom Alberta answered…2mos2MO

I believe renewable energy sources are a good idea, except for the the fact that producing them has an impact on the environment when the government says it’s a big enough issue already

 @9HXHTR4from Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Yes only if the the gouvernement takes in consideration the amount of pollution the business is producing and their intentions.

 @9HMG2Z4People’sfrom Saskatchewan answered…4mos4MO

they should start making it mandatory that if a certain company's carbon emmisions are too high they need to start using more renewable sources of energy

 @9HGG7VGfrom Ontario answered…4mos4MO

So basically if Opposite Day then renewable is not renewable and then whole energy sphincter will to boom like big bang

 @9H8Y45Lfrom Alberta answered…4mos4MO

keep oil alive and make me money. the government should invest in renewable sources but also keep the oil industry alive as alot of countries still use oil to function

 @9H6W47Hfrom Ontario answered…4mos4MO

The federal government should use revenue from carbon taxes and related to invest in R&D and efficiency improvements to hydro and energy storage systems

 @9GRZW9Kfrom Ontario answered…5mos5MO

Not entirely. Some investment should be made, but companies should be provided incentives to become increasingly eco-friendly, especially on an international scale with regulations.

 @9GPTJ2Dfrom British Columbia answered…5mos5MO

No, producers of non-renewable energy sources should be taxed to incentivize them to transition to the production of renewable energy sources.

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia answered…5mos5MO

We can certainly help with grants in the national interest, to expand renewable energy and make it more accessible for businesses.

 @9GH2KFFfrom Alberta answered…5mos5MO

No. If we run out of energy sources in the future it will be the job of the people in the future to figure out a solution.

 @8VSR96Sfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on who's view of what is renewable. Electric cars are not, forestry is.

 @8VSM475Communistfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

They should nationalize all energy resources and eliminate non renewable resources, except for nuclear which must be dramatically expanded.

 @8VRK7FCfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

All sectors , oil and gas included, trying to produce cleaner energy and products should be eligible for funding

 @8VRH9N6from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VRCCP2from British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VR79MXfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, by offering private citizens (e.g., homeowners) and businesses to be able to produce renewable energy at a similar cost to current energy prices.

 @8VQZYZYfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

The government should only encourage and incentives anything they want to accomplish. Anytime the government gets involved in vertically everything it becomes a mismanaged mess.

 @8VQYSS9Greenfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VQF7ZGfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VPBV3ZCommunistfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Nationalize the Energy enterprises to start the production of renewable energy sources and phase our Fossil fuels.

 @8VNXC8Mfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

No. Renewable energy doesn't have enough power per ton to power the world. The proper way to go is nuclear power.

 @8VNRPTFfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VNMCFJfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VN6FXMfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VMR33Cfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Does the government have money to subsidize this, I don't think so. This mean they will be taking it from the people, and some of us are struggling to get by as it is.

 @8VLTRHBfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VLGPJJfrom Saskatchewan answered…3yrs3Y

The government should support our oil industry more. We have all this oil to make money from. Make like Norway and nationalize oil production.

 @8VKN3MJfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

At what environmental cost? Electric vehicles are good (hydrogen cells are better), but where do you think the material for those deep cycle batteries comes from? Does that extraction not produce as much, if not more, environmental damage?

 @8VK5QPHfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

The government should subsidize the decision of homebuyers to install solar panels on their rooftops but should not subsidize big business.

 @8VK5277from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

They should put the money into making gas and oil more cleaner, so that it benisits all Canadian citizens

 @8VK4ZKJConservativefrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

The government should concentrate on nuclear power while reducing power sources that produce GHG emissions. R&D on Thorium. Expand the power grid capacity and subsidize people's home renovations to convert to electric heating.

 @8VJVNDVfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

This should be a joint responsibility of the government and private industry…. Incentives

 @8VJFQJNfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Yes for we must find a green energy source or we we’ll be left behind

 @8VJDW6Gfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

With limits but not throw money away on products which have not been evaluated that it will not harm the environment in other ways like windmills like we have now.lots of metal waste, fuel consumption in transporting them as well as how it affects wildlife and human health and it is way to heavily subsidized.

 @8VJC5F5from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, unless the renewable sources is totally unfeasible (ie. ethanol)

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...