Land acknowledgments have become increasingly common nationwide over the past few years. Many mainstream public events — from soccer games and performing arts productions to city council meetings and corporate conferences — begin with these formal statements recognizing Indigenous communities' rights to territories seized by colonial powers. The 2024 Democratic National Convention began with an introduction reminding delegates how the convention is being held on land that was "forcibly removed" from Indigenous tribes. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Zach Pahmahmie and Tribal Council Secretary Lorrie Melchior took to the stage at the start of the convention where they welcomed the Democratic Party to their "ancestral homelands."
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@B2L42TM2wks2W
No, that is virtue signalling first treatment First Nations with respect and comply with all treaties signed only them you can acknowledge the land
@B2KR6772wks2W
Land acknowledgements do nothing of use, do more for indigenous peoples rather than doing useless land acknowledgements
@9YMS6L83mos3MO
Yes, and they should do more for Indigenous communities.
@9W2RRYK4mos4MO
It doesn’t break my heart if they do, but it’s a fickle, sad display. “We are sorry for what we have done, but we refuse to give it back.”
@9VZT3KK4mos4MO
Yes, but it is virtue signaling if all they do to recognize Indigenous communities is this.
@9VW59ZN4mos4MO
No, I find instead of bringing people together, it’s creating more hatred.
@9VF4NS94mos4MO
Yes, but only when the event has something to do with indigenous culture.
@9V869ZL4mos4MO
It's should not be compulsory, I think it's the right thing to do though.
@9V7ZQ9S4mos4MO
Yes, as long as the land acknowledgement is not performative in nature
@9TXLQ285mos5MO
Acknowledgement is condescending. Do something material or stop the acknowledgments.
@9TQFF9X5mos5MO
Land acknowledgements are a nice idea, but words mean nothing if the government is still going to exploit and harm indigenous people
@B2BHXJB1mo1MO
No, land acknowledgments are often viewed as offensive to indigenous people as they are meaningless words.
@B29TC2JConservative1mo1MO
Yes, but only if the event the acknowledgement is for is actually taking place on once-Indigenous land.
@B24GG482mos2MO
Land acknowledgements are important but the organizations running the events should be doing more than just acknowledgements
@9ZYVF3M2mos2MO
I feel like land acknowledgements should be included for stationary events, such as erected buildings or parks, but not for streets.
@9ZRQ8ZP3mos3MO
I don’t think it should be a requirement, but it is a very important act of acknowledgment.
@9ZMGHLR 3mos3MO
Feels like an empty statement. What are words without actions, acknowledging you are on indigenous land while harming indigenous people means nothing
@9ZLYGN73mos3MO
Yes, and the land acknowledgements should be written and/or approved by the Indigenous community it is acknowledging.
@9YK7T9B3mos3MO
The government should focus less on symbolic acts of support for Indigenous people and more on materially improving their lives and making sure they can all do basic things like drink clean water and afford food.
@9XQCRFDConservative 3mos3MO
No, it's primarily lip-service that's reductive of the broader history of the land and its people.
Yes, but only if the event is associated with action retributive and restorative action
@9X3ZQ9S3mos3MO
these do nothing and do not help indigenous people it is just so we feel better
@9W555VD4mos4MO
No because what are they doing to fix the problem. We all know it's stolen land
@B2SZMQD3 days3D
No, but this land shouldn't definitively be anybody's. It's land, and we should all be allowed to use it.
@B2W86PR6hrs6H
I feel like this has become trendy and insincere and for this reason I’m unsure if it is meeting it’s original intention.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
