+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 753 University--Rosedale voters.

68%
Yes
32%
No
65%
Yes
26%
No
3%
Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office
4%
No, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to
0%
Yes, and also required to release their medical records
1%
No, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties
1%
No, their income is none of our business

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 753 University--Rosedale voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 753 University--Rosedale voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from University--Rosedale voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9XYC3PVfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, and they must also release their personal holdings to promote transparency and to prevent conflicts of interests.

 @9DXHQ26from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @8VT966Bfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9MKYHZ7from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

No not for their personal finances, but they should require a public audit every year they are in office

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, and all trust, foundation and corporate tax records for 5 years prior to election and every year that they hold office.

 @9JXW8SVfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

if they are receiving funding, they should provide a legal paper trail of where that funding is being distributed.

 @9J6QYXYfrom Saskatchewan  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, once they run for any political office above the municipal level, like provincially or federally.

 @9HSTJPK from Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Yes and they should have to publicly release the amount their office costs the riding, (and not through running through hoops to find such information) I also think they should HAVE TO visit every town in their riding at least once per year. Dr. Kitchen has NEVER been to Montmartre!