At the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 178 countries voted to adopt Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is non-binding action plan that sets climate sustainability and poverty. guidelines for national, state and local governments. Proponents argue that the agenda’s guidelines will encourage federal and local governments to protect the environment and combat poverty. Opponents argue that global organizations should not make rules for local governments and these rules are unnecessary because they are impossible to enforce.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Response rates from 404 Wascana voters.
64% Yes |
36% No |
62% Yes |
29% No |
2% Yes, and exceed the guidelines and be the world leader in environmental standards |
4% No, come up with local solutions that work for each community |
1% No, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead |
|
0% No, and the UN should be abolished |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 404 Wascana voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 404 Wascana voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Wascana voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2FYZ3C4 days4D
For Canada’s country size where the least computed country in the world, we shouldn’t have to be the same as what they’re trying to get considering we produce barely anything
@B29BM442wks2W
The guidelines should be considered, but we should have regional solutions and standards, while also sanctioning countries that are top contributors
@Canadianpunk89 1mo1MO
Yes but only for big issues that a local town alone can't fix. For smaller issues, let them use their own local guidelines.
@9ZZCS472mos2MO
increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead while also implementing our own sanctions to contribute
@9ZNXMHS2mos2MO
I would do our best to go in the direction of those guidelines and simply follow though, maybe over four or five years, and then continue that trajectory onward.
@9VF2RTR4mos4MO
Only if it makes sense based on our society needs and environmental guardianships and also financial support for the people
@9TXBP2Y4mos4MO
Yes as a framework but also look at local needs and adopt additional measures, or equivalent alternatives if it makes more sense
@Brandonnoe84 4mos4MO
No, come up with local solutions that work for each community, and increase sanction on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead.
Join in on the most popular conversations.