@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policyStarted 1yr agoActive 1 day ago

Do you support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

The two-state solution is a proposed diplomatic solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposal envisions an independent State of Palestine that borders Israel. Palestinian leadership has supported the concept since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez. In 2017 the Hamas (a Palestinian Resistance movement that controls the Gaza strip) accepted the solution without recognizing Israel as a state. The current Israeli leadership has stated that a two-state solution can only exist without Hamas and the current Palestinian leadership. The U.S. would have to take a central role in any talks bet…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings x  Rhinoceros

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 241 Rhinoceros voters.

84%
Yes
16%
No
84%
Yes
16%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 241 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 241 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rhinoceros voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9KSKML3from Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Israel is an illegitimate state built on apartheid ideology. I support a free, self-determined Palestine where (formerly Israeli) Jews and Palestinians can coexist.

 @9KNP36Ffrom Saskatchewan  answered…11mos11MO

I do not think a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is possible. I support the abolishment of the ethno-state of Israel, and the formation of a new state that provides equal rights for all people regardless of race and religion.

 @9KY7DCBfrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

No, The land of Palestine should be returned to the Palestinians just as it was before the Zionist migration to their (Palestinians) land, claiming it as theirs (Zionists), and causing trouble amongst the locals(Palestinians).

 @9JSGBK9from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Israel is a terorist state and should be charged with genocide of killing so many innocent children and families with a long occupation for 75 years

 @9JWZHWWfrom Saskatchewan  answered…12mos12MO

No, Israel has continuously violated any attempt at peace.. The only way for the conflict to stop is by having a free Palestinian state.

 @B2S35ZYfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

Only if Palestinians officially recognized and Israeli state and the right to exist, and there is a peaceful entity to negotiate with. Otherwise, we should favour Israel only

 @9T7LR7Sfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Theoretically, the two state solution should have been the best solution for both governments. However, with how hostile the current governments of Israel and Palestine are to each other, it does not work in it's current state; it would need reform in order to work.

 @B23CRQ3from Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

No, only a 1 state solution, called Palestine from the river to the sea. Eliminate Israel from the world and we should finance, arm and train Hamas, Hezbollah, Fatah, Lion's Den, Ansar Allah and IRGC-Quds Force, PFLP, DFLP, etc.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine” news articles, updated frequently.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4 days4D

Congress Calls Trump's Gaza Plan "Bizarre And Incoherent"

Trump proposed unprecedented U.S. control of Gaza Strip during a White House press conference with Netanyahu, suggesting "long-term ownership" that could last 10-15 years.The plan calls for nearly two million Palestinian residents to permanently relocate to neighboring countries, marking a dramatic shift from decades of U.S. policy.Congressional leaders from both parties expressed skepticism, with even Trump ally Lindsey Graham calling the proposal "problematic."Middle East experts, including former Palestinian Authority advisor Khaled Elgindy, criticized the plan as "bizarre and incoherent."White House officials argue mass relocation is the only viable option and seek to convince Egypt and Jordan to accept displaced Palestinians.The administration estimates Gaza reconstruction would take 10-15 years, far longer than the 3-5 years outlined in cease-fire agreements.The proposal lacks clear details on how to handle Palestinian resistance to relocation or potential U.S. military deployment.Saudi Arabia immediately rejected the plan, stating it wouldn't normalize ties with Israel without a clear path to Palestinian statehood.Trump expressed uncertainty about the current cease-fire's durability while presenting his proposal.The plan faces significant implementation challenges and could complicate other regional objectives, including Israel-Saudi normalization efforts.

▲  2321 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4hrs4H

Gavin Newsom Defends Immigrants With $25 Million

Governor Newsom signed legislation allocating $50 million total to protect California's policies from Trump administration challenges and defend immigrants facing deportation, split evenly between the state's DOJ and legal defense groups.The funding comes as California anticipates renewed conflicts with Trump's administration, following over 100 legal actions against his first term policies on issues including climate, water, and immigration.Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas justified the funding by characterizing the Trump administration as "out-of-control" and threatening to Californians' constitutional rights.The signing occurred just after Newsom's Washington visit to secure federal disaster aid for January's devastating Los Angeles wildfires, which claimed more than two dozen lives.California recently enacted a separate $2.5 billion fire relief package, with expectations of federal reimbursement for disaster response costs.Republican lawmakers criticized the legal defense funding as a political distraction from wildfire recovery efforts, with State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones calling it a "slush fund."Critics raised concerns about the possibility of funds being used to defend immigrants with serious felony convictions, though Newsom indicated this wasn't the intended purpose.The legislation emerged from a special session Newsom called shortly after Trump's election in November, demonstrating California's proactive stance against anticipated federal challenges.During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 120 lawsuits against his administration, spending approximately $42 million on legal battles.Annual legal expenses fighting federal policies during Trump's first term ranged from $2 million to nearly $13 million per year.

▲  1120 replies