@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscienceStarted 9mos agoActive 4wks ago

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Economic Liberalism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 274 Economic Liberalism voters.

57%
Yes
43%
No
57%
Yes
43%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 274 Economic Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 274 Economic Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Economic Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B28V839from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

I think as long as it is used in a positive matter, like to prevent genetic malfunctions in a child.

 @9ZVXBWMfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2mos2MO

I think there should be some restrictions to ensure that there is not too much regulation that could cause problems.

 @9RBNFB7from British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Human genomic editing should only be done for genetic diseases or to correct epigenetic markers affecting the health of the individual, not affecting gametes

 @9R4Q69Pfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

genetic modifications as in what? to save someone life? Or only because they want it?

 @9QZTDKHfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes only if the technology is proven to be safe for use, because then it would be like taking a medical surgery for a health issue.

 @9QW7TQZfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, and nationalize it to make sure it is regulated properly and consistently.

 @9PGWNV4from Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, it should only be used to prevent disabilities.

 @9P8NRFM from Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, as long as CRISPR technology is safe and suitable for use.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

AOC Sparks Backlash After Ditching Gender Pronouns

Famously progressive Democrat congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows by removing her pronouns from her X account. The move from Squad lawmaker, 35, seen as one of the most liberal members of Congress, was seen by some as a sign that the cultural tide is turning following Donald Trump's election win. Journalist Benjamin Ryan said records showed AOC removed her 'she/her' pronouns sometime between August 3, 2023, and May 28, 2024. Critics branded her a hypocrite, and noted that just two years ago AOC apologized to followers for not having pronouns in her Instagram bio, claiming they 'fell off' and she didn't realize. Conservatives were quick to mock AOC after it was realized that she had removed the pronouns from her account bio. Some also noted that she changed her moniker from the genderless 'Representative' to 'Congresswoman' as she removed her pronouns. Ocasio-Cortez has long been a supporter of transgender rights, including so-called gender-affirming care for children, and transgender girls competing in female sports.But the Democrats more extreme stances were blamed as a massive vote loser for Kamala Harris in the recent election.An advert showing her supporting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries for illegal migrant prisoners was played on repeat by Team Trump.Many Dems' insistence that opposing hormones for trans children or banning trans girls from joining female sports teams was transphobic further alienated centrists.Immigration and inflation were the issues that ultimately swung the election for Donald Trump, but the Dems' unpopular trans stance has now forced a reckoning within the party.

▲  2117 replies