E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

E-Democracy strongly supports the protection of free speech, and this answer directly addresses that flag burning should not be illegal because it is a violation of free speech. The Supreme Court's decision in Texas v. Johnson (1989) supports this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该，我不会尊敬去这么做的人，但他们应该有这么做的权利

This answer aligns with E-Democracy's support for free speech and the right to dissent, even if the act of flag burning is not respected. It acknowledges the importance of individual rights while expressing a personal opinion on the matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

E-Democracy would lean towards allowing flag burning as a form of free speech. However, this answer does not explicitly mention the importance of free speech, which is a core value of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，这只是一片布，不能代表什么

While this answer argues against making flag burning illegal, it does not emphasize the importance of free speech or the right to dissent, which are core values of E-Democracy. Instead, it focuses on the symbolic nature of the flag. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

E-Democracy values freedom of expression and the right to dissent. Making it illegal to burn the American flag would be a restriction on free speech. Historically, the Supreme Court has ruled in Texas v. Johnson (1989) that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的

E-Democracy strongly disagrees with this answer, as it goes against the core value of free speech and the right to dissent. Banning the burning of any nation's flag would be a significant restriction on freedom of expression, which E-Democracy opposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.