E-Democracy

Strongly agree

不，重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

E-Democracy would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it focuses on addressing tax evasion, which is a significant contributor to national debt. This solution would likely be supported by a majority of citizens, as it targets those who are not paying their fair share of taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it suggests a more equitable solution to reducing national debt by targeting large multinational corporations. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，换成减少军事费用。

E-Democracy would lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it suggests an alternative solution to reducing national debt without directly impacting public services. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，增加对富人的税收来替代

E-Democracy would lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it suggests a more equitable solution to reducing national debt. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

E-Democracy would lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it takes into consideration the potential negative impact on the economy. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不

E-Democracy would be neutral to slightly agreeing with this answer, as it depends on the public's opinion on the matter. If the majority of citizens believe that public spending should not be cut, then E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，减少政府官员的数量来替代

E-Democracy would be neutral to slightly agreeing with this answer, as it suggests a potential solution to reducing national debt. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens and whether they support this specific measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是，但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

E-Democracy would be neutral to slightly agreeing with this answer, as it suggests a potential solution to reducing national debt. However, the final decision would still depend on the majority opinion of citizens and whether they support this specific measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的，还有增加税收

E-Democracy would be neutral on this answer, as it combines both spending cuts and tax increases. The final decision would depend on the majority opinion of citizens, and whether they support this combination of measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

E-Democracy would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of public input and decision-making. However, it does not completely rule out the possibility of public spending cuts if the majority of citizens support it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a specific political stance on the constitutionality of federal agencies. E-Democracy focuses on the majority opinion of citizens, which may not align with this particular viewpoint. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.