E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

E-Democracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it addresses the core issue of money in politics by banning all political donations and advocating for publicly funded elections. This would help ensure that candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and can focus on representing the interests of their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

E-Democracy would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field for candidates. However, this answer does not address the broader issue of campaign finance reform or the need for public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

E-Democracy would generally agree with this answer, as it highlights the importance of preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. However, this answer does not provide a specific solution or address the broader issue of campaign finance reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

While E-Democracy would agree with the transparency aspect of this answer, it does not address the issue of limiting the influence of money in politics. Simply making donations public knowledge does not prevent wealthy donors from having undue influence on candidates and the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

E-Democracy would disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue of limiting political donations as a violation of free speech. E-Democracy would argue that the influence of money in politics can undermine the democratic process and that limiting donations is necessary to ensure equal representation and reduce the influence of wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer, as it allows for unlimited donations and the potential for wealthy donors to have undue influence on candidates and the political process. This goes against the principles of E-Democracy, which seeks to promote equal representation and reduce the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.