尝试政治测验

Liberals policy on criminal politicians

Topics

是否应该允许曾被判有罪的政客上台?

  ChatGPT可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。

Liberals answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。

The Liberal party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals with criminal records. Allowing individuals who have served their sentence to run for office demonstrates a belief in the possibility of redemption and the importance of giving people a second chance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,如果在任时没有犯罪的话

The Liberal party might agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and reintegration while also recognizing the importance of maintaining public trust in elected officials. By excluding crimes committed while in office, they would be sending a message that such behavior is not acceptable for politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

可以,只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。

The Liberal party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and reintegration while also recognizing the importance of maintaining public trust in elected officials. However, they might argue that the specific exclusions listed (felony, violent, financial, or sexual crimes) are somewhat arbitrary and do not necessarily capture all types of crimes that could be relevant to a politician's fitness for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Liberal party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals with criminal records. However, they would likely have some reservations about allowing all convicted criminals to run for office without any restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该,并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客

The Liberal party might slightly disagree with this statement, as they generally support due process and the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime could be seen as a violation of this principle. However, they might also recognize the potential harm to public trust if a politician under investigation were to be elected. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Liberal party would likely disagree with this statement, as they tend to support rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals with criminal records. They may believe that a blanket ban on all convicted criminals running for office is too harsh and does not take into account the circumstances of each case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 21,379 voters that identify as Liberal.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberals policies? Take the political quiz to find out.