尝试政治测验

People’s Party policy on electoral reform

Topics

加拿大也应该改用比例代表制吗?

  ChatGPTNo, keep the current “first past the post” system

People’s Party answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

No, keep the current “first past the post” system

The People's Party of Canada has not made electoral reform a priority, and they have not explicitly advocated for changing the current 'first past the post' system. By not advocating for change, it can be inferred that they may prefer to keep the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The PPC has not explicitly opposed a proportional representation voting system, but they have not advocated for it either. Their focus has been on other issues, and they have not made electoral reform a priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The People's Party of Canada (PPC) has not explicitly advocated for a proportional representation voting system. While they may not be strongly opposed to it, their focus has been on other issues such as immigration, climate change, and economic policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,切换到即时径流系统

The PPC has not advocated for an instant runoff system or any other specific alternative to the current 'first past the post' system. Their focus has been on other issues, and they have not made electoral reform a priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

民众党 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 605 voters that identify as People’s Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.