Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 处方药
2>2 Personal answerBasic drugs, yes. There must be checks and balances to prevent big pharma price-gouging and influence peddling, especially in the area of regulation. |
教育 › 大学学费
2>2 Personal answerHidden subsidies should be scrapped and replaced with scholarships. Many University programs are not marketable and people would not pay for them when they see this. As well, Universities can have some of the largest bureaucratic largesse out there, and need to pick up their game. |
环境 › 环境规制
2>2 Personal answerBusinesses should be encouraged to adopt sustainable practices, rather than exploitative ones. However, regulation also encourages work-arounds, careful monitoring, and legal challenges -- very expensive! Best to have economic incentives and disincentives -- which business can understand. |
医保 › 牙齿保险
2>2 Personal answerYes but show people the bill first and get reimbursed later. If people think it's free, they shirk their own responsibilities. |
环境 › 日志记录
2>2 Personal answerYes and no. Some old forest are ripe for natural forest fires. We need replanting of varied, and strong genetic forests. This requires a managed approach, with selective harvesting, protection, and replanting. |
国内政策 › 本地资金
2>2 Personal answer不,不是的货币资金,我们应该将提供援助,教育,培训的形式,和社会方案 |
环境 › 重点管道
2>2 Personal answerPay landowners above market value. Use the oil royalties the restore affected lands (replant forests, animal migration causeways, etc). With these costs known in advance, the project will not be so lucrative. |
移民 › 移民
2>2 Personal answerA qualified yes. Avoid criminals, encourage skilled workers, keep numbers normalized to avoid population spikes or major demographic change. |
经济 › 自由贸易
2>2 Personal answerQualified yes. We need to protect non-renewable resource and invest in our people. |
经济 › 经济刺激
2>2 Personal answerBetter to help laid off works, keep them busy, training or other work than in the streets suffering or committing crimes. An ounce of prevention is a pound of cure. As for companies, they made their money, have insurance, and often get merged or acquired by others anyway. |
教育 › 中学后教育
2>2 Personal answerCurriculae should have federal, provincial, and international components; funded from provinces, federal gov, and even municipalities (think skilled trades, community work jobs, etc). |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.