Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 政府监视
4>4 Personal answer"yes, but only by court order' in each and every instance pertaining to every IP address and phone number. NO STINGRAY blanket eaves dropping allowed! |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
4>4 Personal answerI can't believe this is up for debate. NO, always a choice and it is so shameful that we are a nation at war (really at the beck and call of the US) instead of a peace keeping country. Investing in war to create peace is like have sex to maintain virginity, it does not compute. |
环境 › 环境规制
4>4 Personal answer是的，为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
4>4 Personal answer是的，但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
4>4 Personal answer应该，只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
经济 › 普遍的儿童护理
4>4 Personal answerWe live in a patriarchal society; when Canada started doing "women in non traditional trades" they left out the other half of the equation which was to teach men how to multi task. Child rearing needs to be revered instead of being viewed as 'less than'. It is not just a universal child tax, we need a complete overhaul of wages to reflect the importance and tax breaks for people choosing to raise their own children instead of farming that out to a daycare. |
国内政策 › 本地资金
4>4 Personal answerAs an indigenous person and Canadian I can say that charity does not work. The treaties should be upheld and that needs to be taken care of. Restitution for genocide of our culture needs to be address, and has been in stages. Monies received from the Indian Act need to be abolished, charity doesn't work, it just keeps us from really standing on our own two legs and moving forward. Also, most of my family and friends whom are products of the reserve are not well off emotionally, spiritually or economically. These reserves were set aside in undesirable areas that European people did not want, that needs to be readdressed once the Indian Act gets abolished. So yes, funds for treaties need to be honoured. Funds through the Indian Act need to stop. It is not a popular view but it is our only way forward. |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
4>4 Personal answerThe attitudes of drugs needs a total revamp, look to the Netherlands and round table politics for actual forward movement on the problems that ail our current society. |
移民 › 技术移民
4>4 Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
国内政策 › 通勤火车
4>4 Personal answerThe federal government may invest BUT only if we start getting to use the gas tax, all of it, to help maintain other infrastructure and then they can have money in the coffers for rail. |
经济 › 经济刺激
4>4 Personal answer是的，但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
国内政策 › 魁北克主权
4>4 Personal answerThis is not a yes or no question; several factors need to be considered and requirements met so the rest of the country does not hurt. 1-They must have 75% or higher vote in favour for it 2-They must take their share of debt and pay any potential crown earning directly. 3-They must come up with their own monetary system 4-THEY MUST honour indigenous treaties and contribute to them and have strict environmental rules These are the tip of the ice berg, there will always be issues with cultures clashing, just ask any Cree or Nwiga. |
经济 › 自由贸易
4>4 Personal answer"yes, but only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal" and all deals are free from corrosion. We need to respect our Earth and take care of our own peoples first instead of playing into the interests of countries who control the world markets. |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
4>4 Personal answer不是，比尔是空泛的范围、 监督和问责制的问题 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
4>4 Personal answer不，公司和商业机构也不应该 |
经济 › 就业保险
4>4 Personal answer是的但与限制设置为与以上平均季节性工资的工人 |
国内政策 › 长形式人口普查
4>4 Personal answer是的信息是重要的经济学家、 科学家、 统计学家和政府准确地做出重要的政策决定 |
交通运输 › 商业无人机
4>4 Personal answerThey can use drones for commercial purposes but NEVER can any content be used against individuals. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
