Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
DL>DL Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › Hate Speech
DL>DL Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
经济 › 最低工资
DL>DL Personal answerYes and no, there should be adjustments according to inflation, but prices have already increased in a never ending cycle for so long... and we should bare in mind that lower-wage jobs are mostly for experience. There has been inconsistencies with payments from companies and level of experience...so there needs to be wage regulations instead of an exact minimum wage on all factors. |
社会 › 性别认同
DL>DL Personal answerYes, but only if we provide more education to companies and schools regarding gender identity to increase knowledge and awareness. |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
DL>DL Personal answerYes, but there should be regulations to protect women from sexual assault, on top of awareness for men to not risk the success to protect a women from danger either and vice versa... |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
DL>DL Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
国内政策 › 本地资金
DL>DL Personal answerNo, they should be integrated into our society as citizens |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
DL>DL Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
DL>DL Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
DL>DL Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
医保 › 安全港
DL>DL Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
DL>DL Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
罪行 › 假释听证会
DL>DL Personal answer是的提供严格的心理评价表明他们不再是对社会的威胁 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
DL>DL Personal answer不,纳税申报与他们履行责任的能力没有关系 |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
DL>DL Personal answer是的,NAFTA 帮助降低消费品的价格 |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
DL>DL Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
DL>DL Personal answer不是,比尔是空泛的范围、 监督和问责制的问题 |
医保 › World Health Organization
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
DL>DL Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
DL>DL Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 养老保险费
DL>DL Personal answer不管怎么说,允许员工选择贡献额外 5%-10% |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
DL>DL Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
教育 › Charter Schools
DL>DL Personal answerOn the fence about it. I support it to an extent, but improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages should be practiced. |
国内政策 › 长形式人口普查
DL>DL Personal answer是的信息是重要的经济学家、 科学家、 统计学家和政府准确地做出重要的政策决定 |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
DL>DL Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.