Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
8>8 Personal answerWhy would a teacher carry around a gun in school? School shootings are a rare occurrence. And it could possibly lead to paranoia, anxiety, suspicion, or could cause an accident due to reckless behaviour. |
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should recommend it but not require it |
社会 › 堕胎
8>8 Personal answerPro-Choice, However potential fathers should have the right to opt-out of responsibility. |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
医保 › 处方药
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for low income families & regulate how much pharmaceuticals can charge. Also change IP laws to allow for generic brands faster entry in to the market. |
经济 › 税
8>8 Personal answerAbolish the personal income tax for income <120,000/year, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax with monthly rebates paid to all based on value paid for first 31,000 of income. |
环境 › 环境规制
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for businesses of a certain size. |
医保 › 医疗护理资金
8>8 Personal answerNo, and more services should be privatized and control by regulating maximum fees for procedures. |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
经济 › 最低工资
8>8 Personal answerNo, Remove personal income tax for for $35,000 of income. |
社会 › 性别认同
8>8 Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerNo, come up with local solutions that work for each community |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answerYes, However test should only cover knowledge of basic laws, nationally accepted morals, and an official language. (English or French) |
经济 › 公司税
8>8 Personal answerTax net profits and shareholder dividends |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after eliminating all other social welfare programs. Basic income should be designed to replace these programs and allow individuals more control in their own lives. |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerMore, however regulate fees that can be charged. |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answerYes, but there should be an option for English or French. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerNo position |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
8>8 Personal answerDepends on the severity of the crime, the criminal history of the individual, and the immigrant's legal status |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
国内政策 › 本地资金
8>8 Personal answerNo, they should be integrated into our society as citizens |
环境 › 水力压裂法
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if there is a way to do so without polluting water. |
环境 › 重点管道
8>8 Personal answerNo, private property should never be expropriated |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answerNo, but we should restrict immigrants from “high risk” countries. banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerThis should not be a political question because it is outside the domain of government. Let sporting organizations decide this question for themselves. |
环境 › 再生能源
8>8 Personal answerProvide grants for homeowners to get renewable energy sources installed on their homes and they will automatically help support the production. |
社会 › 死刑
8>8 Personal answerA prisoner should request the death penalty for it to be used |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
8>8 Personal answerNo just decriminalize all recreation drugs. Then they become tax paying entrepreneurs. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
经济 › 社会福利
8>8 Personal answerSystem should be changed as part of major tax reform. |
经济 › 自由贸易
8>8 Personal answerYes, however "free" trade agreements should not impact areas out side of trade or national sovereignty |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerRedirect police to focus on real crimes that impact persons & property. With less enforcement & funding for chasing down victimless or "crimes against society" |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
环境 › 转基因食品
8>8 Personal answerYes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds, product should be labled and should not cause harm to the existing biosphere. |
总统大选 › 总理任期限制
8>8 Personal answerYes, but it should be based on a medical and psyhological check done yearly, not an arbitrary set |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only for votes in local elections |
罪行 › 假释听证会
8>8 Personal answerCase by case basis only |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
8>8 Personal answerYes, and ban all political donations for the purpose of campaigning and publicly fund elections from a fund that allow people to donate to instead.Administration and other party functions can be funded via private donation with no tax write off. |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answerTemporary foreign workers should be paid the same wage as Canadians so companies only bring them in if they can't find workers here. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answerTaxation is theft, and voting is mob rule. Abolish the government. |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 10% |
经济 › 奖金上限
8>8 Personal answerCanadian banks are an oligopoly,thus, bankers should not get any bonus because a bank's success is not dependant on a banker's effort. It's not like Canadians have much of a choice on where to bank. Why is this even a question? Does the gov't currently regulate a banker's bonus? Technically, the gov't shouldn't regulate anybody's bonus. Instead of regulating a banker's bonus, the gov't needs to lower barriers of entry to allow competition. Then the banker's could actually earn their bonuses. |
总统大选 › 选举制度改革
8>8 Personal answerMixed, Proportional for densely populated urban areas with instant runoff system for rural areas. |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported, however corporations and business organizations should not. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answerNo, but make them pay taxes and monitor them better |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answerDon't fund any news site. Leads to possible bias. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNo, but ad targeting should be minimally permitted, such as to a geographic region like tv ads. |
经济 › 养老保险费
8>8 Personal answerNo, and CPP should be an option-not mandatory. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answerYes, but the impact on their victims should be the determining factor. Someone who conned little old ladies out of their life savings should be required to do daily community service shovelling walkways for little old ladies and mowing lawns for them in the summer. House arrest in some cases, but in most cases strict conditions should accompany such releases. |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes but with no gov't funding. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
移民 › 庇护城市
8>8 Personal answerI am not informed enough to have an opinion on this topic. |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
8>8 Personal answerno change, and make the manufactures legally responsible for their products, to the point of assisting in the cost of lawsuits which would be passed on to the manufacturers. Tax payers should not be responsible for devices that malfunction. |
交通运输 › 商业无人机
8>8 Personal answerDepends on application, survey , security, permitted activities..ex. Movie making , conservation surveys , land use monitoring, policing activities, monitoring agricultural practices, fishing practices (especially foreign commercial fishing factory vessels, that appear to rape the coastal fisheries)...multiple other apps .. not acceptable useage is light delivery of mail/parcels/advertising |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.