Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
8>8 Personal answerFor traditional forms, but allow citizens to decide. |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerHonestly, free speech has limits, but no. |
经济 › 最低工资
8>8 Personal answerYes, make it a living wage at $100 an hour. |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes, and no companies should be allowed to profit off of healthcare and this guarantees healthcare for everyone |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerNo, and the UN should be abolished |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerYes, at $300,000 a year, but will not replace a working income. (or should not replace a working income) |
外交政策 › 联合国
8>8 Personal answerNo, abolish the U.N. it is globalist propaganda. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerOnly for vaccines, but nothing else. Only use animals equivalent to humans. But the rest is animal cruelty at its finest. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer是的,社交媒体公司有政治偏向,需要受到监管 |
国内政策 › 本地资金
8>8 Personal answerYes, they should and we should give them their land back completely. We should also repeal the racist Indian Act. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
8>8 Personal answerYes, and nationalize this industry. Drill, baby drill. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
环境 › 北方网关管道
8>8 Personal answerNo, Enbridge has a poor history of pipeline installations, choose a different company instead. |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
8>8 Personal answerYes, if they're repeated offenders and if there is proof someone died from the drugs they trafficked. |
移民 › 移民
8>8 Personal answerYes, we currently have too many immigrants |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。 |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
8>8 Personal answerNo, this could segregate society. We also are too early to decide this. If this does get issued, people who are not vaccinated, for whatever reason could face discrimination and will be perceived as having COVID-19, this could create injustices. We should never implement this system. This is also against the constitution. |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
国内政策 › 工人罢工
8>8 Personal answerYes, anyone should be allowed to strike |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase taxes on all income brackets, focus on ending tax evasion, increase taxes on large companies, increase import and export tariffs and duties and if we cut public spending this will negatively impact the economy. |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 75% |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective and we should only be funding national and local programming for healthcare instead. |
总统大选 › 选举制度改革
8>8 Personal answerYes, and add instant runoff if no Party Leader gets the popular vote. |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 参议院
8>8 Personal answerElect, people who are elected are less prone to corruption and we need to know who our Senators are. |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only after they eliminate personal political opinions and only report what the government wants them to report. We should nationalize all news networks. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 养老保险费
8>8 Personal answer不管怎么说,允许员工选择贡献额外 5%-10% |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
国内政策 › 长形式人口普查
8>8 Personal answer是的信息是重要的经济学家、 科学家、 统计学家和政府准确地做出重要的政策决定 |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes, but ensure it is nonpartisan and encourages more Canadian media to be shown |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.