Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
8>8 Personal answeri dont want people holding a gun to my kids head, teachers shouldnt be allowed to habe that shit near my kids |
教育 › 大学学费
8>8 Personal answertuition rates are supply and demand, If we geared people towards 2 year collage degrees than we wouldnt have this problem |
环境 › 环境规制
8>8 Personal answerMake them aciuntable to the enviroment that they are destroying |
国内政策 › 枪支管制
8>8 Personal answernope, I dont want any istitution with the ability to control my life and safty |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › 最低工资
8>8 Personal answerreplace it with UBI, most people wouldnt need to work if you reduced excess value gains |
社会 › 性别认同
8>8 Personal answerCanadian anti discrimination laws are a meme at this point |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerNo, and the UN should be abolished |
环境 › 日志记录
8>8 Personal answerCompanies cannot log anywere until they are willing to leave it nearly as prestine as when they found it |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerI only want free care for life saving drugs and basic care and mental health care |
医保 › 医保
8>8 Personal answeri fear the day the governemnt is the peoples dialysis machine. We should only be using it for medication tyat helps the mentally ill dieing and the poor |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
8>8 Personal answermost people in jail are innocent. all prisoners should be treated equaly, but for the moat serious of crimes whatever stopps them from doing it again would be best, so in that sence yes |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answerwast of time and money so no |
环境 › 水力压裂法
8>8 Personal answerif that fluid goes in my tap imma bomb those fuckers. they need to be held acointable to who they harm |
环境 › 重点管道
8>8 Personal answerthe state should not have the right to expropriate land |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerjust let the drug Olimpix i wanna see people juiced out of their mind doing dead lifts |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
8>8 Personal answerfashon policing is a joke so let them |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answeryes and end the war on drugs |
经济 › 工会
8>8 Personal answeri dont care just let them compete against one another, if their too large their too incompedent |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, and abolish the police |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes, and abolish the police |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answerwe should proiritise our own citisans |
国内政策 › 工人罢工
8>8 Personal answeryes and allow for multiple comeating unions |
国内政策 › 能源部门
8>8 Personal answerI would privatize but allow local governments to provide poor people with free electricity payed by those who arent useing it |
经济 › 国内工作
8>8 Personal answerin a true free market most businesses would be small, allowing the rich to fet richer would only cause more monopoly, we should prioritise small business and their freedom. and with larger businesses allowing workers to make their own descisions would be better |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answeri dont care sure |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
8>8 Personal answer不是,比尔是空泛的范围、 监督和问责制的问题 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answerNo, and eliminate funding |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 养老保险费
8>8 Personal answer不管怎么说,允许员工选择退出的 CPP 和投资于私人养老金计划 |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.