Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 义务兵役
T>T Personal answerThe military does not want criminals, they like people who have education and skills. Few children at age 18 know what direction they want to pursue, public service for a year - be it military or other service would be very beneficial to aiding maturity for youth. Colleges today generally prolong adolescence. |
经济 › 税
T>T Personal answerNo, that's not the way economics work. No we need lower taxes and less government bureaucracy. |
社会 › Gender Transition
T>T Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
T>T Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
移民 › 公民考试
T>T Personal answerYes, and so should all citizens that graduate high school. |
经济 › 公司税
T>T Personal answerLower, provide incentives for employers to come to U.S. communities to provide jobs. Incentive corporations to develop public works, parks, and schools. |
经济 › 全民基本收入
T>T Personal answerNo, we have been doing this during Covid and it has contributed to "The Great Resignations". People get value, improved mental health, improved physical health, and other benefits from working. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
T>T Personal answerNo, persuade not punish! Mandates don't work. Herd immunity is rarely reached for any virus, but requires a majority not 100% immunization. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
T>T Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
T>T Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
环境 › Animal Testing
T>T Personal answerYes, but only under ethical guidelines. NIH and Dr. Fauci have been shown to have known they are funding off shore unethical animal research - that needs to stop. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
T>T Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
T>T Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
T>T Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
T>T Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
T>T Personal answerNo, they don't have supervision now and it would just milk the taxpayers to require supervision. Just make all drugs legal and stop the 'drug war' - it is a failure. We didn't have drugs illegal until 100 years ago and people did as they choose. Keep driving or operating anything that endangers others while intoxicated illegal. It's like trying to make drinking illegal - people are going to do what they want regardless of the laws. |
经济 › 工会
T>T Personal answer100 years ago labor unions helped many workers, now the unions are robbing their members of wages, the administrators get rich, and almost nothing is done to benefit the workers but they support corrupt politicians. |
经济 › 社会福利
T>T Personal answerNeed more information - this is not a one size fits all answer. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
T>T Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
T>T Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
T>T Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
T>T Personal answerIt needs to be the right amount of visas per job. I have worked in hospitals that import nurses and refuse to high new graduates from local colleges/universities. They say the imported nurses have experience - that's a joke! I had to spend months with my colleagues training them. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
T>T Personal answerNo, these folks are putting their selves and our neighborhoods at risk. Most of these people have mental health problems (including addiction) and don't like the rules enforced by the shelters. Therefore, we need to rethink our mental health, drug and alcohol addiction, and homeless shelter programs. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
T>T Personal answerNo and stop using the IRS as a Gestapo. |
移民 › 双重国籍
T>T Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
T>T Personal answerYes, It depends on the location. Federal government may assist states or local communities in funding to maintain some public transportation - i.e. old subway systems. |
医保 › World Health Organization
T>T Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
T>T Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
T>T Personal answerYes, there is too much corruption between all levels of the media and politics. However, we need multiple levels of media that allow for freedom of speech. Many viewpoints should be heard and allow people to decide what is best for them. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
T>T Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.